Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Brasil Levar até o fim a luta contra o bolsonarismo! - Revista Revolução Cultural

 


A fuga de Flávio Bolsonaro do País, no dia seguinte à sua derrota eleitoral, com o apoio de Trump, confirma que o bolsonarismo não é uma mera corrente política, mas um grupo de sabotadores, conspiradores e terroristas, financiados pelo imperialismo estadunidense. É preciso combinar a mobilização das ruas com medidas econômicas efetivas de proteção aos trabalhadores, para recuperar a sua parcela que se deixou iludir pela demagogia bolsonarista. Ao mesmo tempo, devemos exigir a repressão mais severa contra os bandidos fascistas, seus líderes e financiadores.


A onda de mobilização popular que atropelou o bolsonarismo nas últimas semanas é um grande acontecimento brasileiro e mundial. Ela prova que é possível vencer a extrema-direita, desde que se rompa a política de concessões e apaziguamentos e se lhe enfrente medida por medida. O fato de que uma liderança moderada como Lula tenha sido o catalisador deste movimento é resultado de décadas de desorganização e confusão ideológica entre aqueles que se dizem revolucionários. A estes, cabe trabalhar duro e com clareza, ligados às massas trabalhadoras, para reocupar a vanguarda do processo histórico, não apenas na literatura, mas também na vida. Ao contrário do que apregoam certos catastrofistas, o fato de que a enorme mobilização de massas tenha resultado em derrota do bolsonarismo é o melhor cenário para a continuidade da luta nos próximos anos. As pessoas simples do povo despertaram para a luta política, experimentaram os laços de solidariedade e esperança que nascem da militância, ganharam confiança nas suas próprias forças e ninguém será capaz de devolvê-las ao papel de meras espectadoras.


O bolsonarismo é o nome brasileiro para fascismo nesta quadra do século XXI, como integralismo o era na década de 30 do século passado. Trata-se de um movimento que representa os setores mais reacionários do capital financeiro e que pretende mudar a forma estatal de dominação da burguesia, instaurando uma ditadura contrarrevolucionária aberta. O bolsonarismo tentou uma quartelada há apenas quatro anos e agora, durante as eleições, praticou sabotagem contra o deslocamento de eleitores, censura nas redes sociais e se valeu de financiamento estrangeiro para impulsionar seus candidatos. Se eleito Flávio Bolsonaro, é líquido e certo que não haveria pleito daqui a quatro anos - o que, incrivelmente, foi confessado pelo próprio candidato derrotado. A sua fuga confirma que se trata de um grupo geneticamente golpista, que trama para vender o nosso país ao imperialismo estadunidense.


A derrota eleitoral, contudo, não significa o fim do bolsonarismo, que deitou raízes econômicas, políticas e culturais na sociedade brasileira. A manutenção da sua força, entre 2022 e 2026, mesmo após o 8 de janeiro e a revelação das entranhas da tentativa de golpe, comprova a falência da política de apaziguamento. Foi a brava juventude, sedenta de vontade de lutar, que rompeu anos de desmobilização e iniciou a jornada antifascista a partir de 5 de outubro. Agora que Lula foi reeleito, os mesmos articulistas e dirigentes partidários que trabalharam diuturnamente pela eleição de Bolsonaro recomendam a cartilha de prudência, ajuste fiscal e pacificação, ou seja, um estelionato eleitoral que frustraria as camadas populares e alimentaria a demagogia bolsonarista. Devemos exigir que o novo governo implemente o quanto antes o fim da escala 6x1, mantenha a proibição das bets, institua a tarifa zero nos ônibus e enfrente as demandas populares por direitos trabalhistas, habitação, saúde de qualidade e tantas outras. A mobilização de massas não deve ser um anexo das diretrizes que vêm dos palácios, mas um fator independente de defesa dos direitos dos trabalhadores e de luta ideológica antifascista na base da sociedade. Ao mesmo tempo, devemos reivindicar que os líderes e financiadores dos golpistas sejam devidamente punidos. O mesmo vale para seus provocadores locais, que merecem receber o devido castigo da ira popular.


Por fim, desde esta Revista saudamos o povo brasileiro, pela demonstração de energia, coragem e solidariedade que assombraram o mundo. Há um ditado que diz “se os velhos pudessem, se os jovens soubessem”. Nessas últimas semanas, o que se viu foram as gerações anteriores reunindo forças da onde parecia não haver para agir, unidas às gerações mais novas que souberam o que fazer quando as cúpulas batiam cabeças. O Brasil que amamos e defenderemos contra a agressão imperialista não é o país dos Nikolas, Pavanato ou Campopiano; não é o Brasil da celerada do chicote ou dos racistas e assassinos de aluguel.


O Brasil que amamos e defenderemos é o Brasil dos milhões de trabalhadores e intelectuais progressistas da cidade e do campo, que se levantaram como uma muralha para barrar a passagem aos insolentes fascistas. Um país capaz de fazer piadas das suas próprias mazelas e lutar com uma energia e criatividade inigualáveis contra seus inimigos. Aqueles que, dizendo-se de esquerda, simplesmente cruzaram os braços e ficaram à margem deste potente movimento de massas contra os nossos piores inimigos, são, no melhor dos casos, doutrinários incorrigíveis, e no pior lacaios remunerados da reação, que merecem ser repudiados como quinta-coluna da direita nos meios operários.



Avante, sem recuar, desmobilizar e nem esmorecer!

India – bsCEM: Rise in Rage Against the Brutal Repression on Jamia Millia Islamia!

 

India – bsCEM: Rise in Rage Against the Brutal Repression on Jamia Millia Islamia!

We hereby share a statement published by Bhagat Singh Student Union Platform (bsCEM) on their Instagram on October 27.


On October 24th 2026, security personnels and security guards stormed the site of protests at Jamia Millia Islamia. The students there have been protesting and five of them have gone on a hunger strike for the demand of an independent body of elected students union that has been banned since the year 2006. The people from administration and staff came around the site of protest in the guise of negotiations and talks but then started brutally removing students and manhandling them.

Then on 26th, Monday, the Jamia Administration issued a notice ordering the election will be conducted within 15 days after the approval of the Union Constitution, but this notice does not give any assurance of the resignation of Vice-Chancellor and Chief proctor who are the boot licking slaves of the Brahmanical Hindutva Fascist State, and were the ones to brutally manhandle the students when they fiercely struggled for a democratic campus. Also the notice asking the protestors to publicly apologise in a press conference for the “defamatory” remarks made against the administration and all the statements, actions, and posts which are related to this should be taken down. But the protesting students rejected this notice, refused to bow down before the Sanghi

Administration who tried to stifle the protest by the notice. The students refused to apologise and demanded that the student election must be announced, and vowed to continue their hunger strike and fight until their demands met.

Followed by the bogus notice issued by the administration in the name of conciliation, on the fifteenth day of agitation, In the evening of 26th October itself, once again the students faced a fresh crackdown from the Brahmanical Hindutva Fascist State. The students were manhandled and detained by the Sanghi administration, the lapdog of the RSS-BJP fascist State. This exposes the falsity of the sham order and the subservient nature of administration to the very fascist system.

The students at Jamia Millia Islamia have resolutely stood against the bootlicking administration of the Brahmanical Hindutva Fascist state. They have refused to compromise with their democratic demands in the face of the fascist nexus between the university administration and the state forces which only work as anti-people forces to unleash violence and brutality on the common masses. The administration by offering the particular conditions has only shown that they want the students to end their protest and strike as soon as possible so that under the garb of restoration of normalcy they can again continue the saffronisation without any hurdles from the students.



On the Crisis in Europe - Revolutionary Communist Party, Nepal,

 

On the Crisis in Europe

Europe is currently in turmoil. Its streets are populated almost exclusively by protesters and police. Commercial and social activity has come to a near standstill; schools are devoid of students, and factories and industrial plants lie idle. This is not limited to one or two nations; a similar situation is unfolding across several countries and cities throughout Europe. During the day, clashes erupt between demonstrators and the police. As the police deploy tear gas, water cannons, and batons, the public retaliates by hurling stones. Large shops, closed throughout the day, are taken over by protesters as evening falls. People could be seen freely grabbing whatever they could find inside those stores and running off, with no one, neither shop staff nor police, present to intervene. The police appear helpless. This is a brief glimpse of the unrest currently sweeping across Europe.

This movement is taking place in the southwestern region of Europe—home to ancient civilisations and nations considered both developed and prosperous. Countries currently experiencing intense protests include France, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Portugal, Albania, Austria, and Greece. The unrest is spreading to other nations, including Germany and Serbia, with no sign of subsiding soon. There is no central coordinating body leading these movements, nor are they being orchestrated in a planned manner by any revolutionary political party. This movement is, in essence, an instinctive, and spontaneous expression of the long-simmering resentment among young students, reformist trade unions, and the ordinary working people.

Student protests, which began at an ordinary rural school in France, initially sparked by awful classroom conditions and a shortage of teachers, have now spread across the entire country. Police and protesters are clashing in the streets. So far, four people have died during protests in France. On September 27, a 14-year-old boy suffered a extricated jaw after being struck by a grenade fired at close range by a police officer. On September 29, a police officer was reported to have choked a 14-year-old girl, while a young man had his hand severed after being hit by a police-fired grenade. Paris’s historic, 143-year-old town hall has been reduced to ashes, and there is no count of how many vehicles have been set ablaze on the streets. It is estimated that over a million people took to the streets on October 17 during protests in major French cities, including Paris, Marseille, Lyon, and Bordeaux. Reports indicate that the government deployed 70 thousand police officers for the demonstrations held yesterday, Saturday. To date, 3 thousand 4 hundred protesters have been arrested, while more than 1 thousand 2 hundred police officers have reportedly been injured during confrontations with the protesters. The core demands of the demonstrators relate to basic livelihood issues: reversing the government’s decision to cut public spending, increasing the social security fund, boosting state investment in education and healthcare, curbing inflation, and raising wages etc.

In Italy, hundreds of thousands of people have taken to the streets over issues concerning inflation, low wages, the high cost of healthcare, and housing. Clashes between protesters and the police have begun to break out in cities such as Rome, Milan, Turin, and Bologna. In Spain, the core demands of the movement include wage increases, control of inflation, and improved, and affordable access to housing. The movement has intensified further following the eviction of an 87-year-old woman named Maricarmen from the rented home where she had spent nearly her entire life, on the grounds of non-payment of rent. In Belgium, protesters are focusing their opposition on government budget cuts to public spending and rising prices. In Portugal, the protesters are demanding higher wages and lower housing rents. Similarly, in Albania, Austria, Greece, and Germany, protesters are calling for the reversal of government decisions to cut public spending, a reduction in the cost of living, wage increases, and improvements to education and healthcare. It appears that the protesters’ demands are similar across these countries; all of them are linked to people’s basic livelihood.

It is perhaps a coincidence that the major European nations currently experiencing intense social unrest are the very same countries where capitalism first developed. Alongside the United Kingdom, these nations include France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Germany, and Portugal. As capitalism reached its highest stage, these nations transformed into imperialist powers. History is a witness that these imperialist states established colonies across Asia, Africa, and Latin America. The aforesaid Western European nations are considered economically prosperous; the prosperity gained primarily upon the vast wealth plundered from their colonies.

The labour movement in Europe had been strong ever since the rise of capitalism. Following the success of the October Socialist Revolution in Russia in 1917, the European labour movement attained significant momentum. Fearing the implications of this, imperialist rulers began using a small fraction of the wealth looted from their colonies to exert financial influence over the revolutionary leaders of the labour movement. Consequently, the labour movement gradually shifted away from the objective of establishing proletarian power, narrowing its focus instead to reformist demands. Lenin termed this “trade unionism” and strongly opposed it. Thus, the infiltration of the labour movement by imperialism paved the way for the emergence of revisionism within the communist movement.

Following the Great Depression of 1929, unemployment surged across capitalist nations. This did not merely trigger an economic crisis; it created structural problems within the capitalist economic system itself. Meanwhile, influenced by the Russian Socialist Revolution, revolutionary movements began to advance throughout Europe. It became very difficult to suppress the socialist movement and sustain the existing social order using only traditional, and liberal-democratic methods. In an effort to shield capitalism from the influence of socialist Russia, Adolf Hitler, an adherent of ultra-nationalist ideology, established the National Socialist German Workers’ Party in 1920 in Germany. Similarly, Benito Mussolini, who had a socialist background, founded the National Fascist Party in Italy in 1921. Just one year after assuming leadership of his party, in 1922, Mussolini became the Prime Minister of Italy. Likewise, in 1933, Hitler became the Chancellor of Germany. Both of their objectives were to dismantle the liberal democracies that had emerged following the First World War and to establish fascist empires globally through war. The Second World War began on September 1, 1939. However, the fascist powers faced mounting defeats. Mussolini was shot and killed on April 28, 1945, while Hitler committed suicide on April 30, 1945. The Second World War concluded after Japan surrendered in August 1945 and formally signed the instrument of surrender on September 2, 1945.

The Second World War, initiated to destroy the Soviet Union and expand fascist empires worldwide, resulted not only in the defeat of the fascists themselves but also in the emergence of a significantly more powerful socialist bloc globally. In 1949, the New Democratic Revolution was accomplished in China, and socialist states were established in Eastern European nations, namely Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, and Yugoslavia. The economic devastation left in the wake of World War, the growing appeal of Stalin, the triumphant hero of the Second World War and leader of the world proletariat, and the victory of socialism in China and Eastern Europe posed a formidable ideological, political, and economic challenge to imperialist rulers. To reconstruct 17 war-torn European nations, revitalise the European economy, and contain the spread of socialism, the United States introduced the $13 billion Marshall Plan in 1948. Furthermore, the Keynesian mixed economy and the welfare capitalist model were promoted to mislead people influenced by socialism.

Under this model, most economic aspects of scientific socialism were incorporated, mainly in Europe, in  their policy, while the ideological and political aspects were set aside. Pro-people schemes including free healthcare, free education and scholarships, unemployment benefits, social security allowances, maternity and child-rearing support, and adequate pensions for retired employees were implemented. These economic programmes were introduced specifically to counter the influence of socialism. Meanwhile, on April 4, 1949, a military alliance, NATO, was formed under the leadership of the United States to defend mainly Europe against potential aggression from the socialist bloc. Although it was said that all member nations would share the expenses, the major burden fell upon the United States, and this situation persists to this day. More recently, Trump has exerted significant pressure on Europe to increase its financial contributions to NATO.

Given that American imperialism took on the responsibility of defending Europe against threats from the socialist bloc, European rulers did not have to be concerned more about their own security. Furthermore, possession of wealth seized from former colonies, along with a workforce highly skilled in science and technology, allowed European life to continue with relative ease for some time. European leaders lived a rest assured life, failing to foresee the challenges that lay ahead. After several decades, situation began to change. In the 1970s, the global economy collapsed due to a severe economic crisis. To avert this crisis, imperialist powers introduced neoliberalism, which pushed markets into a realm of global competition. Other countries began producing goods that were both cheaper and of better quality than those manufactured in Europe. Unable to hold their own in global market competition, European industries gradually withered away and European markets flooded with Chinese goods. Meanwhile, America’s global dominance also began to gradually decline. All of these developments served as alarm bells for Europe.

Against this backdrop, Europe’s economy gradually weakened due to several factors: pressure from the United States to increase NATO spending; a decline in domestic production; disruptions in fuel imports from Russia caused by the war in Ukraine; the growing appeal of Chinese goods in European markets; rising costs associated with the Ukraine conflict as the U.S. began to scale back its involvement; and the multi-dimensional inflation triggered by fuel supply linked to recent tensions between Iran and the U.S. The depletion of accumulated wealth originally plundered during the colonial era, and the end of colonialism following the Second World War contributed to this decline further. This represents the internal dimension of Europe’s current crisis.

Meanwhile, as sources of national revenue dwindled and expenditure requirements grew, governments across Europe resorted to borrowing from financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank to cover their expenses. Consequently, public debt reached significant levels: 119.1% of GDP in France, 139.9% in Italy, 101.4% in Spain, 140.8% in Greece, and 110.2% in Belgium. To ensure the repayment of these loans, the IMF and the World Bank started exerting intense pressure on these governments to cut national spending and adopt austerity measures. Under this pressure, governments began drafting budgets that slashed public services and benefits previously enjoyed by their citizens, to secure the funds necessary to repay their debts to the IMF and the World Bank. Thus, the visible causes behind the current crisis in Europe are the soaring cost of living, which places a crushing burden on the general public, and the government’s gradual reduction in public facilities. It is a clear confirmation of what Marx and Engels wrote in the Communist Manifesto: that the executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.

To resolve this problem, one must identify its underlying causes. They are the inherent contradictions of capitalism. Neoliberalism brought these contradictions to the surface. In other words, the current crisis in Europe is the result of the European ruling class’s efforts to safeguard corporate profits, an attempt to compensate for the losses incurred from the 2008 economic recession, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the subsequent inflation at the expense of the proletariat. Although this crisis has now erupted in Europe, the fire of this crisis is smouldering across the entire globe, whether in imperialist countries or the oppressed nations. The only solution to this crisis is a scientific socialist revolution, led by the proletariat and guided by Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.

At this juncture, a question comes up: how far will the current movement in Europe go? This is an important question. The ‘Unite Communist’, an organisation formed in France to unite genuine communists to build a revolutionary communist party, has issued a statement on October 14 concerning the ongoing movement in France. The statement writes, “It is clear that the current movement will not lead to revolution. There is no crisis severe enough among the masses or within the bourgeoisie, nor is there a Communist Party capable of leading the masses in their struggle. In this regard, the current movement is politically and ideologically dominated by the reformist parliamentary and labour union left. But the current movement is full of hope. It is one of many signs that we are moving toward radical changes within the next decade or decades.” This assessment is correct.

The spontaneous protests erupted not only in oppressed nations but also in underdeveloped and developed countries, in general, and most notably the current movements in Europe, in particular, suggest that conditions for the proletarian revolution are becoming increasingly favourable, even within developed capitalist nations. In the past, based on the analysis of the characteristics of ‘welfare capitalism,’ Mao identified Asia, Africa, and Latin America as the ‘storm centres’ of revolution. Today, however, neoliberal capitalism is driving not only oppressed nations but also developed capitalist countries toward a deep economic crisis. Consequently, it is no longer just the nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America, oppressed by imperialism, that are storm centres of revolution; but developed capitalist nations unable to compete on the global stage are also becoming storm centres of revolution. The fact that the United States, once the initiator of neoliberalism, now leans toward protectionism, while China has embraced neoliberalism, is highly noteworthy. It signals a paradigm shift in the previous situation and concept. Within the contemporary international communist movement, revolutionary communist parties must pay close attention to this transformation and focus on developing the line, strategy, and tactics for a proletarian revolution.

10/26/2026

solrojo mexico - sobra la victoria de Lula - por el debate

 


Brasil. La segunda vuelta en las elecciones presidenciales ha dejado un nuevo resultado que no sorprende mucho, el triunfo de Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. El hecho está siendo celebrado por gobiernos oportunistas y todo tipo de corrientes reformistas, socialdemócratas y revisionistas que ven esto como una “auténtica victoria democrática”, dejando de lado los elementos objetivos de fondo. Antes de entrar en ello, tenemos la obligación moral de subrayar lo siguiente: es algo bueno que el bolsonarismo no haya ganado las elecciones, ya que su arribo a la presidencia de la república solamente implicaría la asunción del fascismo al poder del Estado. El triunfo del bolsonarismo sería, como lo dijo Jorge Dimitrov, la dictadura más terrorista del gran capital sobre los trabajadores. Sin embargo, la permanencia de Lula en la presidencia no es tampoco lo mejor para las masas, sino la continuidad de una política que sigue la receta del despojo, la opresión y la explotación del pueblo bajo un discurso “progresista”, redundando en la cooptación de amplios sectores organizados bajo la férula del oportunismo. Ciertamente estas elecciones en Brasil representaban un foco de atención en toda la región ante la injerencia descarada desde el llamado “Escudo de las Américas”, liderado por el imperialismo yanqui para imponer gobiernos más reaccionarios como sus títeres. También es verdad que, desde antes de la primera vuelta y los días previos a la segunda, esta injerencia norteamericana quedó evidenciada desde distintos medios e incluso fue confesada por el mismo imperialismo yanqui. Pero lo más importante a observar son justo los elementos objetivos detrás de esta elección y su resultado, el cual no es garantía de ninguna vida democrática. Aquí planteamos unos puntos para el análisis: 1) La contienda entre Lula y Flavio Bolsonaro no fue “una batalla entre el bien y el mal”, sino la expresión material de la pugna interburguesa entre la facción burocrática y la facción compradora, ambas serviles -a su manera- ante el imperialismo. 2) Precisamente por ello se ha tratado de una elección de Estado, donde la facción burocrática en el poder –después de confiarse durante la primera vuelta- ha tenido que utilizar el peso del aparato que posé confrontándolo con la capacidad económica de la facción compradora y el respaldo material que le proveyó el trumpismo. 3) Aunque la segunda vuelta arroja un resultado del 51.79% de los votos en favor de Lula contra un 48.21% de estos para Bolsonaro, ni el oportunismo ni el fascismo están satisfechos con ello. Esto es así porque Lula y sus huestes saben que su triunfo ha sido pírrico y no les alcanza para gobernar sin un acuerdo con la reacción y el imperialismo; por su parte la reacción encabezada por Flavio ya dejó claro que no reconoce su derrota y anticipa que impugnará la elección. 4) Este hecho confirma la posibilidad de que ni el bolsonarismo ni el imperialismo yanqui reconozcan los resultados de buena manera y abre dos perspectivas: la presión para negociar o el golpe reaccionario. 5) Ante este panorama es imperativo advertir que el triunfo del oportunismo no representa, ni mucho menos, el fin de la reacción ni de la amenaza fascista, y por tanto tampoco representa ninguna victoria popular. La política de Lula se centrará en dar continuidad a sus políticas antipopulares y más concesiones al imperialismo para tratar de generar “estabilidad y gobernabilidad”. 6) Por todo ello, el proletariado y pueblo brasileño tienen todo el derecho y la obligación de construir sus organizaciones de combate, no solo para enfrentar el riesgo del golpe, sino principalmente para construir un Nuevo Poder, liberando territorios, barriendo a los enemigos del pueblo y desarrollando las tareas de la Revolución de Nueva Democracia. ¡Abajo el oportunismo y el fascismo! ¡Viva la lucha del pueblo brasileño!

Founding Congress of the Anti-Imperialist Front (USA) - info


Significance of the Congress

While the world bears witness to the beginning of the end of US hegemony in the Middle East, US imperialists face another thorn in their side with the Founding Congress of the Anti-Imperialist Front (USA). From within the belly of the beast, the Anti-Imperialist Front (AIF) is taking a bold step forward in assuming its responsibility to the international working class and oppressed peoples, who are fighting and dying everyday to sweep imperialism and its lackeys off the face of the earth!

The Congress was a significant step forward for the anti-imperialist movement in the US and the world over. It represented a leap in the unity of anti-imperialist revolutionaries in the US, dedicated to forging an Anti-Imperialist Front within the world’s sole imperialist superpower to fight against the main enemy of the peoples of the world – US imperialism. The theme of the congress can be summed up by its main slogan: Anti-imperialists of the World, Unite!

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Allemagne : Enquête policière sur l’incendie de camions militaires revendiqué par un groupe révolutionnaire

info secours rouge

En Allemagne, l’Office régional de la police criminelle enquête sur l’incendie de trois camions de la Bundeswehr survenu dans un atelier de réparation à Barleben, dans l’est du pays. Les autorités examinent l’authenticité d’une revendication publiée sur la plateforme Indymedia par un collectif s’appelant « Groupe d’action des travailleurs rouges Ulrike Meinhof », qui relie ce sabotage à un engagement antimilitariste.

Les enquêteurs étudient également d’éventuelles connexions avec des destructions similaires perpétrées contre des véhicules militaires à Berlin, Erfurt et Soltau. Cette série d’actions ciblées contre les infrastructures logistiques de l’armée illustre l’intensification des résistances directes et antimilitaristes face à la politique de réarmement de l’État allemand.

Monday, October 26, 2026

Italia - 24 ottobre - Cariche contro le manifestazioni - Operai di proletari comunisti contro la polizia a fianco dei giovani - Le masse cantano "Bella ciao" - L'intervento tra i giovani in lotta di operaio del PCm Italia

Cariche poliziesche

Torino

Firenze

Milano

 

Operaio di proletari comunisti fermato 

sua forte denuncia contro la polizia, a fianco dei giovani

Grande appoggio delle masse

Giovani, adulti, tutti cantano "Bella ciao", contro la polizia

Intervento di compagno operaio del PCm Italia 
tra una marea di ragazzi e ragazze

Youssef libero


Ed è proprio in via Dante una via piena di gente dove non stava succedendo nulla che in mezzo ai passanti un gruppo di 7/8 poliziotti motorizzati ‘alla francese’ intervengono contro giovani fermati da una pattuglia a piedi. 

Vista la situazione interveniamo per denunciare ad alta voce quello che sta accadendo e la loro reazione è di circondarci e chiedere documenti con relativa minaccia di essere portati in questura.

Nel frattempo la situazione ha concentrato l’attenzione della stampa presente e via via delle persone che passavano per la via, con alcune che sono intervenute, giovani e meno giovani, contro l’operato della polizia e a sostegno della nostra denuncia come si vede nei vari video.

Quindi ribaltando la minaccia ‘documenti’ con la denuncia dei rastrellamenti e dei metodi intimidatori della polizia per costruire il giovane/manifestante/ribelle/criminale, foto al muro con il passamontagna e intercalato dalla denuncia della situazione più generale, ha messo in difficoltà la polizia che non si aspettava che qualcuno si mettesse in mezzo, visto che hanno cercato di spiegare e giustificare il loro operato fornendo una loro ricostruzione ai media.

Questo dimostra ancora una volta che non possiamo stare in silenzio perché quello che sta succedendo non può diventare normalità e inoltre ci spiega che se si risponde in maniera determinata e adeguata, mettendo al centro le ragioni collettive che legittimano la protesta si ottiene la reazione e il sostegno della maggioranza del popolo, che siamo moralmente superiori e che loro non sono imbattibili.

Intanto si andava formando quello che poi diventerà un grosso corteo, con la determinazione di chi è andato in piazza e via via con il passaparola ha ingrossato il concentramento sfidando e reagendo alla militarizzazione delle vie milanesi, ai rastrellamenti, ai fermi preventivi.

Un primo concentramento di almeno un migliaio di manifestanti, è stato bloccato a Lanza da uno schieramento misto di carabinieri polizia guardia di finanza, che ne impediva l’avanzata verso il centro.

Dopo un lungo fronteggiamento la manifestazione ha cambiato direzione ed ha allargato il giro sfilando verso piazza Repubblica, Bastioni di Porta Venezia…, per finire al Politecnico. Un corteo composto in prevalenza da giovani, nessuna realtà ‘di movimento’, in prevalenza slogan antifascisti, contro Meloni, Meloni/Vannacci, Salvini/Lega, la polizia, il carovita, le condizioni della scuola, per la Palestina visibile anche con le bandiere.