YORUM | Öncesi ve Sonrası ile NATO Toplantısına Dair… Özgür Gelecek Gazetesi - for debate

"''NATO 3.0'' ise Rusya'nın yeniden temel askeri tehdit olarak tanımlandığı, Çin'in uzun vadeli stratejik rakip olarak dikkate alındığı ve Avrupa'nın kendi savunmasının daha büyük bölümünü üstlenmeye zorlandığı yeni dönemi anlatıyor."

14 Temmuz 2026

Belli periyotlarda yapılan NATO toplantılarından 36.sını geride bıraktık. Fakat yankıları hala devam ediyor. 20 gün içinde kayıtlara göre 548 kişi tutuklandı. Devrimci-demokratik muhalefetin dışında TEMA Vakfı’ndan onlarca kişi, örgüt üyesi oldukları gerekçesiyle tutuklandı. Başta Ankara olmak üzere İstanbul ve İzmir’de onlarca devrimci-demokrat tutuklandı.

Elazığ Valiliği bile Ankara’da yapılacak toplantıyı gerekçe göstererek il genelindeki tüm etkinlik ve eylemleri 14 günlüğüne yasakladı. Peki neden bu korku? Efendilerine güçlü uşak mesajı vermek için. Sokak gösterilerinden ve devrimcilerden korktukları için. Anti-emperyalist mücadelenin büyümesini engellemek için. Ayladır sokaklarda mücadele veren NATO karşıtı platformları engellemek ve dağıtmak için…

Emperyalizme ve NATO’ya göbekten bağımlı Türk devleti, efendilerinin gözüne girmek için ne yapacağını şaşırdı. Trump geliyor diye aylar öncesinden hazırlıklara başladılar. Erdoğan, büyük diktatörden istediklerini almak için 200 milyon liraya dev NATO panoları yaptırarak Ankara otobanlarını, şehrin kaldırımlarını donattı. Yüz milyonlarca lira para harcayarak şehrin eski yapılarını boyadılar, birçok eski yapıyı cilaladılar. Ankara’yı makyajladılar.  Bunu yapamadıkları yerlerde de branda çekerek görünmemesini sağladılar.

Makyajın arkasında yatan yoksulluğu göstermemek için çok çaba gösterdi AKP-MHP hükümeti. İşçi ve emekliler, öğrenci ve memurlar, emekçiler yoksullukla, açlıkla mücadele ederken Saray rejimi, şatafatlı gösterişler yaptı. Uluslararası kanlı terör örgütü NATO’yu protesto eden binlerce işçi, memur, öğrenci polis zoruyla tutuklandı, işkenceye maruz kaldı.

Le sommet de l’OTAN en Turquie : un bilan - for debate

 

Le sommet de l’OTAN en Turquie : un bilan

supernova revieu

Dans le contexte actuel de concurrence mondiale, même les structures transnationales sont inévitablement amenées à évoluer. Depuis un certain temps déjà, l’OTAN assume une fonction davantage tournée vers le front intérieur (de contre-révolution préventive) que vers l’extérieur. Elle reste l’axe d’intervention de l’impérialisme occidental, mais on assiste à une dimension de plus en plus hétérogène, liée à la crise d’hégémonie de l’impérialisme. Dans ce contexte, les États-Unis restent l’élément hégémonique et central pour les pays impérialistes.

Le récent sommet de l’OTAN à Ankara, qui s’est tenu les 7 et 8 juillet, a été présenté par la propagande occidentale comme un succès retentissant. On y parle d’unité, de milliards de nouveaux contrats de défense et d’un engagement « inébranlable » envers l’article 5 du Traité de Washington. Les gros titres se réjouissent que l’Alliance ait survécu aux tensions. Cependant, un regard plus approfondi, loin des feux d’artifice médiatiques, révèle un tableau bien différent. Le sommet d’Ankara était l’expression d’un empire qui lutte pour maintenir son hégémonie tandis que ses vassaux, craintifs mais de plus en plus autonomes, cherchent à assurer leur propre survie. L’OTAN n’est pas une alliance défensive, c’est un vecteur des intérêts de Washington, et son histoire récente est celle d’une expansion constante vers l’Est, une provocation calculée qui a systématiquement ignoré les préoccupations légitimes de la Russie en matière de sécurité.

Tunisie : Le prisonnier Ghassan Boughdiri entame une grève de la faim après 120 jours de détention

Le militant tunisien Ghassan Boughdiri a annoncé le début d’une grève de la faim illimitée après plus de quatre mois de détention. Il est détenu depuis 120 jours sans avoir été auditionné par le juge d’instruction et dénonce des accusations infondées.

Dans une lettre rendue publique, il affirme que « la Palestine a réécrit son droit au prix du sang et du feu » et que la résistance à Gaza a contribué à créer « un climat révolutionnaire mondial pour la propagation de la liberté ». Il réclame son droit à être entendu et à pouvoir se défendre face aux accusations portées contre lui.

A disputa pelos espólios de Bolsonaro e o rumo das eleições - brasil

  Revista Revolução Cultural

A combalida candidatura presidencial de Flávio Bolsonaro ganhou mais uma fissura com o vídeo em que a esposa de seu pai, Michele, expõe seu enteado por tê-la “desrespeitado” e “apunhalado”. Embora não tenha havido nenhuma espécie de derretimento da candidatura de Flávio, o fato é que a disputa pública se configura como mais uma barreira para que ele consiga vender a imagem de “moderado” e atrair para sua campanha os eleitores considerados indecisos, decisivos agora como em 2022.

 

Para além da superfície, é preciso olharmos o jogo de forças por trás desta disputa, que se trava em última instância pelos espólios do legado de Bolsonaro: a defesa do golpe militar, os 700 mil mortos da Covid e alguns milhões de votos. Como todo e qualquer caudilhismo, também aquele reunido em torno do capitão do mato tende à divisão com o desaparecimento (neste caso, um sui generis desaparecimento em vida) do seu chefe. Na verdade, a candidatura de Flávio representa uma mal costurada frente reacionária, composta por diversos setores da direita civil e extrema-direita que não depositam no “01” uma confiança estrita ou ponto de unificação.

 

O que se comprova com a atual crise interna deste movimento – que se manifesta praticamente desde o dia em que ele chegou ao governo federal – é que ele não possui uma unidade ideológica unificada, pelo contrário: ao ecletismo ideológico comum a diferentes manifestações do fascismo (eclético na medida em que vocaliza um discurso “antissistema” e que diz representar o “homem comum”, mas age em defesa dos interesses dos setores mais rapaces do capital financeiro e do latifúndio) se soma o arrivismo do velho capitalismo cartorial brasileiro, pois toda uma plêiade de figuras saídas dos estratos mais imundos da sociedade se agarraram ao vagão bolsonarista com o único intuito de abocanhar um mandato ou um quinhão das verbas públicas. Ocorre que este ecletismo, se permitiu ao Bolsonaro e aos seus galvanizarem amplo apoio entre diferentes classes sociais, também limitou a sua ação unificada e a criação de um verdadeiro partido político.

Revolutionary Students’ Front (RSF) against arrest of leftist activist for the immediate and unconditional release

 

Friends, we have come to know that today (12/07/2026), a moment ago, the Baruipur police arrested Leftist activist Layek Ali on the false charges of ‘inciting’ mass protests following the brutal rape and murder of an underage girl in Baruipur belonging to a minority. After the brutal incident, an attempt is being made to frame him in the mob lynching and death, of one of the accused. Since that incident, we have seen time and again that the ruling BJP government in West Bengal is desperate to save the BJP workers accused in the incident. The main witness and one of the accused in the incident, Prabhas Mondal, was suspiciously killed in an encounter before he could be produced in court.

On the other hand, the leaders and ministers of the RSS-BJP-run Brahminist Hindutva fascist government in the state have resorted to giving this incident a religious color, using the incident to implement their own agenda. Instead of investigating the rape-murder incident in a fair and proper manner, an attempt is being made to suppress the voices of opposition across the state by using the mob lynching incident. The just public protests against the indifference of the government and police authorities are being made a ‘crime’ and the protesters are being targeted with imprisonment. Layek’s arrest is the result of that, not an isolated incident. A few days ago, the new Rowlatt Act and the Hooliganism Act were passed in the state. In fact, the BJP government is eager to make the state opposition-free by any means, so that they can carry out all the subsequent policy decisions as agents of imperialism unobstructed. For that purpose, they are determined to use any brutal incident to their benefit.

If we do not stand against this undemocratic arrest today, tomorrow any ordinary person can be falsely accused of opposing or questioning the government. We, on behalf of the Revolutionary Students Front (RSF), are calling on all democratic, progressive, anti-fascist and leftist organizations and individuals to build a larger militant mass movement demanding the immediate and unconditional release of our friend Layek Ali.

Postmodern Opportunism June, 2026 North Coordination Committee (NCC) Communist Party of India (Maoist) - 3 -

 third part

 Post modern-opportunists and the communist party

 
Comrade Mao said that party is the most important and primary weapon which would wield the peoples
army and united front in order to liberate the people. He further said that party unity can be build only
with an ideological clarity. Comrade Mao said “Our Party will be better united on this basis, that is, on
the basis of our common understanding of ideology, politics and various policies.” Without ideological
centralism within the party there can not be a party to be called communist party. Such should be the
spirit of any organizer who wants to build a party. For a party organizer ideology should always come
first. A party organizer is the one who gives first preference to ideological work over all other work. In
context of our party, the work at ideological front have gained yet more importance. Because on one
hand we are facing the most severe deadliest assault on our party leadership while on the other hand the
opportunist-liquidation-revisionist elements are trying to turn the party into a meaningless organ
suitable for the ruling class. If we want to revive the party, if we want to liberate the oppressed and
exploited people from the murderous comprador feudal fascist onslaught then the only thing to cling
upon is M-L-M. We have to root out all the non-Marxist ideology and practices among us. If we cling
to our ideology then tomorrow if not today we will be victorious but if we for a moment became lazy
on the ideological front of our struggle then we will invite destruction of all that which our martyrs had
achieved through their bloods.
We have to remember that right opportunism is the main danger before us. Our CC-PB too had
recognized the right deviation as one of the reason for the setback. But some among the opportunist
section are parroting that left opportunism too is equally dangerous for the party. This emphasis on left
opportunism is basically a cover to hide their attack on the genuine Marxist line. For they have shifted
rightward to such an extent that correct Marxist path appears left to them. Regarding this comrade Mao
in an pamphlet titled ‘Things are beginning to change’ said “There are also a number of people whose
thinking errs on the side of revisionism or Right opportunism. They pose the bigger danger because
their ideas are a reflection of bourgeois ideology inside the Party, and because they yearn for bourgeois
liberalism, negate everything and are tied in a hundred and one ways to bourgeois intellectuals outside
the Party. Over the last few months, people have been criticizing dogmatism but have allowed
revisionism to go unchallenged. Dogmatism should be criticized, or else many mistakes cannot be
rectified. Now it’s time to direct our attention to criticizing revisionism.” Dogmatism is the reflection
of petty bourgeoisie ideology inside the party while the right opportunism is out and out bourgeoisie
ideology. Though left opportunism or dogmatic is dangerous and needs to be corrected immediately but
in the present condition when there is no left deviated political force in the country or at the world
level, its influence is minimal. The talk of left dogmatism comes up largely from the right opportunist
who wish to attack the correct Marxist line. The real enemy before us is the opportunist-liquidationist-
revisionist ideology. After having recognized the main danger, we must then mark its manifestation in
our party. The right opportunist trends/deviations finds their reflection in following manner:-
1. Attempt to make the party legal and open by deserting the ug life and the path of armed struggle
this they do by raising doubts on ug practice, they say that may be open work too is very
important and equally important to the ug work. They say that situation has changed, state has
become stronger therefore we must reflect seriously on our old form of work. (Here it is
important to note that they have neither said that one should desert the ug life nor have they said
that due to changed situation ug life and armed struggle is not possible)
2. Give importance to democracy at the cost of begetting the more important role of centralism in
the party method of democratic centralism. In the name of democracy they want to rob the
power of the higher committee to get the party line implemented at the local committee level.
They say that we will follow the HC but the HC should ask us before taking any decision
framing this as a pretext they will stop coordinating with the HC. They will swear on the name
of the martyred comrades that they are with the party and are only against the high handedness
of the HC. They say I follow the CC but the HC here is unfit to be followed.
3. They put more emphasis on the language, words, symbols, letters, inverted commas etc.. in
order to find the power gaps between the higher committee and the comrades/lower committees.
They say that the content wise the letter or whatever have been said is okay but the form of the
the language is highly problematic, that it is subjective, bureaucratic and authoritarian. Thus the
whole discussion is wished to be shifted toward the form of power in the language and the
bureaucracy inherent in it.
4. They despise any structure, they do not form a structure or if there is one then they deliberately
keep it authority-less and spineless by not linking it up with the HC. When confronted on this
question they say that when casually an issue can be resolved then what is the need for formal
meetings and reportings to the HC. They say that it is important to get the work done, structure
or no structure is a secondary aspect.
5. They oppose the party stand on gender and sexuality; they are for free love and free sex. They
are for sexual anarchism. They say that party's stand on sexual opportunism and LGBT question
is feudal and patriarchal.

In Italy maoist workers speak with palestinian representants in Milan'demostration for the freedom of palestinian prisoners

 

pc 12 luglio - A Milano per la Palestina, verso la giornata del 18