CPMLM-BD: An Open Letter to the Sincere Comrades of Nepal
Posted on 14 August
2013 by admin
An Open Letter to the Sincere Comrades of
Nepal
Comrades and friends,
Red Salute!
We are sending this
letter at a time when the sun of revolution in Nepal has already gone down long
before. The people�s war that was earth shaking event in contemporary world that
even after liberating eighty percent areas of the country has collapsed because
of the betrayal line of the leaders, and as a consequence, all the achievements
were lost. Now there is no People�s War, no Liberated Areas and no People�s
Liberation Army. There is no hope remaining except the people. Besides, there
are many sincere revolution seeking leaders and cadres who generally exist in
every country as a result of revolutionary process.
The former Communist
Party of Nepal (Maoist)-being a member of Revolutionary Internationalist
Movement rose against Maoism, abandoned the Path of Revolution, disarmed people
and dismantled Base Areas. RIM committee hided those betrayal, advocated a
secret Two Lines struggle, upheld coexistence with opportunism and adopted an
incorrect method of restricting Line Struggle, and thus RIM committee resigned
leading role of RIM. By presenting ideology as � Maoism or Mao thought�, led by
Prachanda-Baburam the revisionists transformed Communist party of Nepal (Maoist)
to Unified communist party of Nepal (Maoist). It was final rejection of Maoism.
Prachanda-Baburam revisionists showed that present world and domestic situation
is not favorable for revolution, so, compromise should be made. They said of so
called bourgeoisie democracy instead of New Democracy. Through the so called
peace talk, they made People�s Liberation Army surrender to reactionary army,
and by surrendering achieved land and power to the exploiters, became
imperialist- expansionists� lackey the fascist Bureaucratic Bourgeoisie. On the
other side, Revolutionary Communist Party, USA also made leap to their own
revisionism. Both CPN (Maoist) and RCP USA, seeing only the outer appearance of
globalized named imperialist world, and not by seeing its contradictory and
moribund essence, presented it as unipolar and showed that war or revolution is
not inevitable. They declared Marxism as insufficient. Both of them abandoned
the concept of Proletarian Dictatorship that is a basic tenet of Marxism. Even
RCP branded the confidence on Marxist Philosophy as Political Truth and hoisted
the flag of non-Political Truth.
With the start of the New Year 2013,
Communist party of Nepal (Maoist) has again been formed. They had invited us to
their founding conference, which is their party�s 7th congress. For that we
express our gratitude to them. It is to mention that a significant number of
sincere Maoist leaders and cadres have united in this party, many of whom have
working experience in International Communist Movement. Some days ago, a party
representative of our party had a discussion with two high rank leadership of
CPN (Maoist). They are hopeful that CPN (Maoist) will lead the revolution and
they emphasized on building a new Communist International and rebuilding
organization like Coordination Committee of Maoist Parties and Organizations.
All know that internationally we made various joint statement with MLMist
Communist Parties of Peru, Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, France, Spain,
Belgium, Arab and Afghanistan where we struggled the successive opportunism
existing in International Communist Movement such as opportunism within the
leadership of RIM Committee, Avakianism, Prachandism and Centrism, and at the
same time, we put forward the importance of an advance Thought for building a
new Communist International. In this context, we want to raise some points to
the sincere comrades within Communist party of Nepal (Maoist) and also we want
to attract attention of the sincere comrades outside that party to the same
points.
Comrades, can a revolutionary army surrender to a reactionary
army? Whatever honor they give you, isn�t surrender itself an absolute dishonor?
Isn�t it a betrayal? So, by dignified surrender what do CPN (Maoist) mean? A
surrenderist party can�t be a revolutionary, can it?
Which class
democracy CPN (Maoist) do believe? Which republic she wants to establish? Is
that New Democratic revolutionary republic or bourgeoisie Federal
republic?
To make revolution, it is necessary to have a Thought. A
Thought guides a revolution through People�s War. Maoism is expressed in each
country through its own Thought. Marxism-Leninist-Maoism and people�s war is
universal. Do you think it is necessary to recognize Gonzallo Thought, which
derived these truths, and is the most important Communist Thought after the
death of Chairman Mao? Is not so called class collaborationist pacifist
Prachanda Thought a bourgeoisie Thought? Does CPN (M) believe in the same
Thought of Prchanda by only just deducting the name Prachanda? Do you reject the
post Maoist named the revisionist New Synthesis Avakinaism?
What is the
reason behind peace talk? Is that for handing over army, areas and power to
reactionaries? After abandoning army, areas and power, what more aim can be
fulfilled with the peace talk?
In Each country, there is newness in Path
of Revolution. Certainly, the particularity of Nepalese Revolution is not
Prachandist Pacifism? So, Nepalese comrades should discover that
particularities, shouldn�t they?
The Bureaucratic Bourgeoisie represents
a semi feudal semi colonial society, who in the name of nationalism,
religion-ism etc want to establish that what fascism is. Today capitalism is at
the stage of its death bed, the imperialism. It has no possibility of further
development. It has no ideology except making hoax. So, different form of
doctrines of moribund bourgeoisie is various treacheries. And that is fascism.
So, what the Nepalese reactionaries want to establish through peace process,
talk and election is fascism, isn�t it?
When a communist party is crushed
and abolished in a capitulationist black path, will that come up by taking part
in bourgeoisie politics or by grasping proletarian class politics?
In
Kathmandu only 10 percent Nepalese live. Why do you give priority to that? When
80 percent areas were liberated, a New Democratic republic could be established
without Kathmandu, and later Kathmandu could merge in the course of
struggle.
Do you agree that `Without a people�s army, people have
nothing? So, in this situation, if there is some popularity, can�t it be applied
to build an Armed Force? And that is not like building secretly a mercenary army
like the bourgeoisie, rather it develops through Armed Struggle,
right?
Do you accept General Validity of People�s War? If so, why are you
saying of Urban Based Insurrection other than initiating People�s War? Why not
insurrection as part of people�s war? As Kathmandu is the center of
reactionaries, will not an insurrection there, will bring a big set back?
Rather, shouldn�t you make insurrection in other region and then initiate armed
struggle there, which is easier also?
What is you position on China?
Isn�t China an imperialist country? What can you achieve by making China an
ally? Will not it bring more imperialist penetration? Will not it make the
communist party an imperialist lackey party?
What is your position
regarding monarchy? CPN (Maoist) expressed its wish to unify with monarchist
former king Ganendra. Will not it reestablish feudalism and monarchy? Will not
it transform the communist party into a feudalist
party?
Comrades,
Once Maoist movement was enough strong in
Bangladesh. Here, Siraj Sikder had produced a Political Party of Proletariat,
People�s war, Bases and Areas of Armed Struggle and a Thought. But after the
martyrdom of Comrade Siraj Sikder, despite Limited Armed Struggle continued,
repeated capitulationist opportunist line made it weak. In hundreds of villages
Maoist communist politics still have influence. But in most of the areas the
leadership party is absent. It is not difficult to change this situation. It
needs a Leadership Structure of a Correct Ideological Orientation. Our new party
has been formed to come up from the current vacuum. We want we will develop
ourselves Ideologically and develop cadres and people Ideologically. Centrism is
betrayal and opportunism. There is no alternative of a correct a MLMist
line.
As CPN Maoist said in invitation that there is friendship between
our two parties and between people of our two countries, it is very correct. We
are the same South Asian people and international fraternity. We sincerely wish,
revolutionary process based on a correct Marxist-Leninist-Maoist ideological
line will march forward in Nepal and Bangladesh.
Revolution in Nepal and
Bangladesh is inevitable!
13 August 2013
Central Committee
No comments:
Post a Comment