Statement
issued by the Office of the Chairperson
International League of Peoples’ Struggle
International League of Peoples’ Struggle
The International League of Peoples’
Struggle views the current surge of refugees to Europe as the
manifestation and consequence of two grave problems for which the
imperialist powers headed by the US are accountable.
First is the relentless imperialist
plunder in the Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia, and
elsewhere, which displaces people from their lands, disrupts their
livelihoods, and forces them to migrate within the region and to
Europe for their economic survival. Second are the wars of aggression
unleashed by the US and its NATO allies, and counterrevolutionary
wars and jihadist operations instigated by the US, UK and the
Zionists in these same regions, overthrowing or disrupting state
systems notably in Syria, Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan but also in a
vast swath of outlying territories from Nigeria to Pakistan. Whether
people are displaced by imperialist plunder or war, they are not
migrants by choice but are refugees.
Images of drowned children from refugee
boats attempting to cross the Mediterranean Sea have generated
intense shock among a broad global public, but they are just the
latest manifestation of a long chain of countless tragedies that have
victimized the peoples of the surrounding regions for decades now.
These events include the long-standing US-led campaigns of embargo
and sabotage against independent regimes throughout the 1980s and
1990s, the US-engineered breakup of Yugoslavia and Balkanization of
Soviet-bloc countries in the 1990s, the all-out “wars against
terror” in Afghanistan and Iraq in the early 2000s, the chain of
WTO and IMF-World Bank impositions leading to the food crisis,
recession, and other impacts of the 2008 financial meltdown, and the
series of US-sponsored regime-change operations hiding behind the
so-called “Arab spring” from 2011 onwards.
The aforesaid factors and trends,
especially in the Middle East, are confirmed by long-term UN
migration statistics. A 2011 study had already projected a general
trend in Muslim-majority Middle East countries of net (out-)
migration of -80 per 100,000 population for the 2010-2015 period. In
contrast, these had enjoyed a net (in-) migration of +63 and +266 per
100,000 in the preceding 1990-1995 and 2000-2005 periods—mostly due
to the influx of migrant labor to oil-rich Gulf states. The projected
out-migration rates as of 2010 were worst for Syria, Jordan, Yemen,
the Palestinian territories, and Lebanon; Iraq could not even provide
migration rates due to demographic disruptions and public services
breakdown.
The combined impacts of economic crises
and armed conflicts were first expressed in big hikes in internal
migration and internally displaced people in individual countries. As
conditions went from bad to worse in the rubble of devastated towns
and cities and congested refugee centers throughout the Middle East,
North Africa and Central and South Asia, they triggered a chain
reaction of increasing out-flux of migrants and refugees across
borders and to distant overseas destinations. The melting-pot
situation throughout the affected regions have also created fluid
migrant-refugee corridors in adjacent areas that at first glance
appear disconnected but actually part of the bigger mass exodus. In
the 2010-2013 period, a UN report identified the Sudan-to-South
Sudan, Palestine-to-Jordan, Somalia-to-Kenya, Romania-to-Italy, and
Poland-to-UK corridors among the biggest ones. The
Turkey-to-Greece-to-Balkans and Libya-to-Italy corridors are
relatively recent and and are made conspicuous by the callous
strenuous resistance of the European Union to accept the refugees.
In Iraq alone, based on 2007 data, the
US war of aggression and continuing armed conflicts have created some
4 million refugees—the largest in the Middle East prior to the
current Syrian crisis, with 1.3 million based in Syria and playing a
big factor in the conflict in Syria. In Afghanistan, the US war of
aggression in addition to the earlier Soviet invasion has likewise
created a minimum of 2.8 million refugees as of end-2008. In Libya,
the official refugee count as of end-2012 was only 65,000 (internal
and external), but as of end-2014 Tunisia alone claims to host some 2
million Libyan refugees affected by the continuing post-Gaddafi civil
war. Efforts at mass-return programs under the aegis of UNHCR have
been only transitory and partially successful at best.
In the past months, the exodus of
refugees from Syria has been particularly overwhelming in magnitude.
According to an end-2014 report, Syria alone had 10 million displaced
people, or 45 percent of its entire population; 6.5 million of these
have remained within the country, while some 4 million have sought
refuge abroad. Counting only those registered with the UNHCR and
staying in just five neighboring countries (Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey,
Iraq and Egypt), Syrian refugees already total 3.8 million. The
relentless stream of boatloads from Libya represents not only
displaced Libyan populations but migrants and refugees from all over
sub-Saharan Africa, including Senegal, Nigeria, and Eritrea. Others,
streaming through alternative routes, have originated from as far as
Pakistan and Bangladesh.
The extreme plight of the refugees
throughout the Middle East and overflowing to nearby countries is
underscored by the many dangers they undertake in their indefinite
stays in refugee centers and long-range treks towards countries that
they hope would accept them. These vagaries include perilous journeys
by entire households, including young children and old people, taking
many days or even weeks in flimsy and overloaded boats attempting to
cross the Mediterranean, or tightly packed inside trucks and trains
via overland routes, with only minimal food, potable water, shelter,
clothing, medicine, and survival gear. Their transport is often
arranged by human traffickers interested principally in making a
profit and not caring whether they survive the journey. They are
often victimized again at border crossings, suffering more injuries
and losses as they scramble through border obstacles.
As of August 31 this year alone, the
International Office of Migration has already recorded 2,643 deaths
related to Mediterranean crossings; many more have drowned,
undocumented. There have been cases of death by suffocation in
unventilated trucks. More than 70 percent of global deaths of
war-displaced people or refugees this year have taken place in the
Mediterranean region—which underscores the general direction of the
mass exodus from Middle East and North Africa to Europe, with Greece,
Italy and Spain as critical entry points. Greece alone has received
more than 218,000 this year; up to 2,000 refugees are crossing every
24 hours from Greece into the Balkans (Macedonia, Serbia, Albania),
through Hungary, and from there into western Europe. About 110,000
others have arrived in Italy.
Europe is understandably the most
preferred destination of refugees from nearby regions because it is
close by and is perceived as a huge territory with numerous options
and opportunities for seeking asylum, resettlement and employment.
However, there is a strict EU law that one can apply for asylum only
in the country of disembarkation. As of June 2015, there were 567,785
pending asylum claims in EU’s 28 member states, of which 306,010
were filed in Germany. In addition, some 340,000 undocumented people
have entered the EU between January and July—with 107,500 in July
alone. Thus, the European authorities describe this influx of
refugees as a crisis.
In the face of humanitarian disaster,
involving so many unnecessary deaths and brutal conditions at border
crossings and refugee centers, the EU has displayed a mix of
superficial mea-culpas and promises to raise its levels of tolerance
in coping with the refugee influx, and manifestations of a more
hardened chauvinist and racist intolerance towards the refugees.
There are moves to mitigate the impacts of the refugee influx on the
EU’s economies. While there are tokens of humanitarian action and
some amount of public guilt over the role of the EU and NATO in the
US-led wars of aggression and other forms of military intervention,
the more dominant and longer-term trend among EU states is to reject
and resist the influx of refugees by limiting its scale, magnitude
and timespan. The imperialists and their political agents continue to
foment a rising wave of chauvinism or xenophobia, religious bigotry
or Islamophobia, racism and other forms of reaction to conceal their
accountabilities for plunder at home and abroad and for the many wars
that they have masterminded.
Internal tensions within EU are also
rising due to the differential impact of the refugee influx on its
various member states, despite the principle of open borders. One
major issue is that there is no cohesive EU-wide policy on handling
asylum seekers, compounded by a de facto rule that refugees may apply
for asylum only in the country where they land. This places the
heaviest burden on Schengen border states such as Greece, Italy,
Spain, and Hungary—which have reacted by calling for a more
equitable system of inter-state cooperation and mandatory quotas for
dealing with incoming refugees. Differences on this issue are
emerging between Germany and France, on one hand, and UK and certain
Eastern European countries on the other hand.
There has also risen the peculiar
situation of the Balkan states (non-Schengen) and Romania and
Bulgaria (soon to be Schengen)—which have become the preferred
transit corridors for refugees wanting to enter Europe’s heartland.
Some countries, including Russia, are raising danger signals that the
influx of refugees is being used by US-organized “Islamic
jihadists” to infiltrate the Balkans and foment inter-ethnic
conflicts to the long-term advantage of the US and NATO, for example
to use as base or backdoor for launching subversive actions and
false-flag operations in Europe.
Ironically, the US and some other big
imperialist powers that have ravaged Afghanistan and Iraq and
afterwards supported mercenary troops and jihadist factions in Libya
and Syria avoid and deny accountability for destroying the social
infrastructure of these countries and generating the conditions for
the current refugee exodus. One study listed eight countries that,
combined, sent the most weapons to Syria since 2011, amounting to USD
16 billion in military “aid” received by various warring
factions, but have accepted only 2 percent of the refugees that
Germany has taken in thus far. The US, in particular, has been
spending nearly USD 1 billion a year since 2011 in covert military
aid for Syrian rebel groups, and launching 2,400 airstrikes
purportedly against ISIS areas within Syria. And yet the US has
accepted only 1,434 Syrian refugees. The other listed
countries—Canada, Russia, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and
selected EU member states—have not fared much better. The four Gulf
countries gave billions of dollars’ worth to Syrian rebel groups,
and yet not one of them has agreed to accept any Syrian refugees.
The ILPS reiterates its deepest
sympathies and most serious concern for the rights of refugees
worldwide, and particularly those of Asian and African origins
currently fleeing from their crisis-ravaged and war-torn countries.
We join other progressive and humanitarian groups in reminding the
more advanced countries of Europe and North America of their
responsibilities under international law to respect these rights,
including the right to asylum and protection.
However, we go further by condemning US
imperialism and its NATO allies and Middle East regional proxies for
creating the conditions that fuel such mass displacements and forced
migrations, including continued military intervention and outright
wars of aggression. Humanitarian measures to rescue, protect and
resettle refugees should be linked to and not detract from the bigger
question of tackling the problem at the root, i.e., resolving the
internal conflicts and stopping imperialist intervention and wars of
aggression.
Certified by:
Prof. JOSE MARIA
SISON
Chairperson
International Coordinating Committee
Chairperson
International Coordinating Committee
- See more at:
http://ilps.info/index.php/en/office-of-the-chairperson/statements-and-calls-to-action/871-on-the-current-surge-of-refugees-to-europe#sthash.Vz7SUnKX.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment