Proletarian of all countries, unite!
Throw The Arrow of Maoism with the Aim of World
Proletarian Revolution!
Let US Close Ranks in January 2th, the Day of Martyrdom
of Chairman Siraj Sikder
Paying Tribute to the memory and contributions of
comrade Siraj Sikder
Central Committee
Organization of the Workers of Afghanistan
(Marxist-Leninist-Maoist, principally
Maoist)
January 2013
|
Prepared for the Internet by People’s War Editorial
Board
|
People’s war until communism!
Throw The Arrow of Maoism with the Aim of World
Proletarian Revolution!
Commemorate January 2th, the Day of Martyrdom of
Chairman Siraj Sikder
Paying Tribute to the memory and contributions of
comrade Siraj Sikder
How shall we apply Marxism-Leninism-Mao
Tsetung Thought to the condition of revolution of our country?
Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tsetung Thought will be the ‘arrow’ what we shall have to
throw with the aim of revolution of East Bengal. Those who throw arrow aimlessly
and in a confused manner, they can easily do harm to revolution. Marxist named
many persons are playing opportunist and counter-revolutionary role by ‘throwing
arrow in a confused manner.
“Chairman Siraj Sekdir”
The Taliban reactionary clique ruled in
Afghanistan from 1996 until 2001. The Taliban clique was basically a reactionary
product of US imperialism, and was also enjoying supports from some of other
western imperialists. But, it was pro-US Islamic extremism of Al-Qaida led by
Ben Ladin, which conducted this clique towards establishing a rule in
Afghanistan. Pakistan and Arab reactionaries were the most committed forces
which recognized Taliban regime in Afghanistan. Indeed, it was Pakistani state
that enjoyed a great deal and used Taliban as an instrument, and expanded its
domination over Afghanistan.
The then leftists and Maoist forces in
Afghanistan, characterized Afghanistan under Taliban as a semi colonial country.
This analysis was a simplification of the situation. Such an analysis “forgot”
the complexity of the situation. However Taliban regime was supported by several
donors, but, analyzing the subordination and obedience of Taliban to Pakistani
government proves that: It was mainly the Pakistani state which conducted the
“remote control” of Taliban regime. The complexity of the situations then was
due to the existence of many contradictions. The basic contradictions then
were:
1- The contradiction of peoples of
Afghanistan versus Pakistan’s puppet Taliban State, and accordingly, versus
Pakistan’s expansionism
2- The contradiction of vast peasantry of
Afghanistan versus feudalism
3- Afghanistan’s people’s contradiction
versus world imperialism, mainly US imperialism
4- The national contradiction with
neighboring countries’ expansionism
5- Contradiction of Afghanistan
working-class versus bourgeoisie
6- The contradiction of the historical
interest of the toiling masses of Afghanistan versus Islamic fundamentalism,
mainly Arab reactionary Islamism
There were many other contradictions, but the
above mentioned were the basic ones, and however for those above mentioned
contradictions were competing each other to place itself as the principal
contradiction, but, mainly the first number mentioned above was the principal
contradiction.
Then again the problem rises. Was Afghanistan a
semi colony or a colony?
If it was a colony, then how can we judge the
“liberated” or “still non-occupied” areas of Afghanistan, which were not under
control of Taliban “central” government?
If it was a semi colony, then, how can we solve
the problem of a large percentage of the land, being controlled directly or
indirectly by Pakistan’s toy, the Taliban regime?
At its tide, more than 90 percent of the
country’s area was under control of Taliban. But the Taliban was only namely the
ruler. In reality all things were controlled by Pakistani government and even
assignment at the sub-district level were done by Pakistani military and
official ones. So, it was more than being a semi colony situation for
Afghanistan. It has many obvious characters of a colony.
The pre-independence East Bengal was once a
colony of Pakistan. The revisionists could not analyze and accept this. They
could not understand that: A semi colonial country like Pakistan could have a
colony
This was chairman Siraj Sikder who truly and
dialectically formulate that: A semi colony can have a colony.
This was also the case in Afghanistan under
Taliban. The principal aspect of the contradiction of Afghanistan’s status of
being occupied by World Islamic Fundamentalists was the Pakistani side.
This side was decisive in arranging the “fate” of
Taliban. So, this was the semi-colonial Pakistan who transformed Afghanistan as
a colony. The difference between Afghanistan and the then East Bangal is that:
East Begal or Bangladesh was then a part of Pakistan on that moment, but,
Afghanistan under Taliban was not officially part of Pakistan. Rather, it was
Pakistani expansionism that was willing to annex Afghanistan as part of
Pakistan.
So, as was the case in East Bengal, it was the
Afghanistan, which was transformed into a colony of Pakistan. But due to
“non-Talibanized” areas of Afghanistan, and due to the influence of other
non-pakistani orientations which were also crucial in managing the Taliban as
puppets, it is correct to say that: Afghanistan under Taliban was a : Semi
feudal, Colonial, Semi colonial country, in which the colonial aspect was the
principal aspect.
This is the correct formulation of chairman Siraj
Siker, which makes us able to characterize Afghanistan under Taliban, with a
scientific formulation, the basic formulation of: semi colony can have
colony.
East Bengal once was a colony of a semi colony.
But in Afghansitan under Taliban, due to the complexity of the situation,
however being a colony was a principal aspect, but partially being semi colony
of other expansionist neighboring was aslo siding the mainly colony status of
Afghanistan.
Indeed, we have developed the formulation of
chairman Siraj Siker in concrete situation of our country. The comrades of CPMLM
Banglaesh correctly proclaim that: we must learn from comrade Siraj Sekdir’s
thought. This is true. Each thought, however being specified for a special
country which generated it, contains many international aspects. This is the
case in Gonzalo Thought, which offers many contributions to world proletarian
revolution. This is also the case with Chairman Siraj Sikder’s Teachings which
offers many things, especially to the revolutions of South Asia.
After a correct analysis of the Afghanistan under
Taliban, we reach to the application of correct of chairman siraj Sikder. This
is a great achievement for us, now we get rid of false analysis of the then
Maoists in Afghanistan under Taliban who formulated and some of them still argue
that: Afghanistan under Taliban was a semi colonial State.
The Taliban reactionary regime was at some tides
a vacillating regime concerning to the expansionist domination of Pakistan. So,
there was a process of vacillation of Afghanistan under Taliban in being
colonial and semi colonial at some time and at some extents. But, the colonial
aspect in this contradiction of vacillation state was the main aspect. So, we
should conclude that:
A semi colony can have both semi colony and
colony. But, logically it is incorrect to argue for a country to be at the
absolute same time and within the same areas as both colony and semi colony.
Indeed, this variation, this vacillation takes place in time and areas . So, at
a specific time, an A country, can be a semi colony of a semi colonial B
country, but at another time, the above mentioned A, can be a colony of that
above mentioned B semi-colonial.
Organization of the workers of Afghanistan
commemorates the day of martyrdom of Chairman Siraj Sikder, and proclaims that:
As is comrade Akrm Yari the founder of Maoist line in Afghanistan, this is
Chairman Siraj Sikder who established Maoism for Bangladish. So, we conclude
that: without guiding thought of these founding leaders, there would have been
no Maoism in these two countries of south Asian. For successful revolutions in
South Asia, the question of Guiding Thought is very important. Indeed, this
question is important for all countries, but, due to many common aspects of the
countries of the south Asia, it is crucial to study the interconnections and
relations between guiding thoughts of the revolutions of this part of the
globe.
Commemorating chairman Siraj sekdir means to
glorify the New Democratic Revolution in Bangladesh. We pay tribute to the
anti-revisionist contributions and struggles of Chairman Siraj Sikder. Indeed,
without practical and theoretical contributions of leaders like Charu Mazumdar,
Siraj Sikder, Akram Yari, Ibrahim Kaypakkaya, Gonzalo there would have been no
basic understanding of what Maoism is. The comrades of then PBSP(MUG)Banladesh
had correctly argued that: we receive Maoism fromMao Tse Tung, Siraj Sikder,
Charu Mazumdar, Ibrahim Kaypakkaya, Gonzalo! We add here in Afghanistan that: we
also receive Maoism, here in Afghanistan, from red line of Chairman Akram Yari.
Comrade Akram Yari was also murdered by reactionaries. He was martyred by
revisionist PDPA regime.
Let us retake Chairman Siraj Sikder and
his Guiding Thought!
Let us retake Chairman Akram Yari and his
shining path!
Long life Marxism-Leninism-Maoism,
principally Maoism!
Long Life the world proletarian
Revolution!
Glory to the revolutionary masses and the
Maoist militants of Bangladesh!
Long life Organization of the Workers of
Afghanistan (Marxist-Leninist-Maoist, principally Maoist)!
January, 201
No comments:
Post a Comment