"Looking at all these assessments, there is no defeat for the CPI(M). It is true that the party suffered a major blow." April 10, 2026 On May 21, 2025, in a clash between CPI(M) guerrillas and the fascist Indian army in the rural area of Abujhmad, Chhattisgart state, India, CPI(M) General Secretary Basavaraj (Nambala Keshav Roa) and 27 fighters were killed. This loss was a major blow for the CPI(Maoist). It would not be wrong to say that this loss at the top of the party led to internal debates within the CPI(M). The successive blows and surrenders following the loss of Comrade Basavaraj brought about various discussions in the public sphere. Current Articles Comrade Basavaraj was both the practical and ideological leader of the CPI(M). His leadership was undeniably recognized for its resolute implementation of the party line and its unifying power within the party. Comrade Basavaraj's assassination also disrupted the balance within the party. A group of purgers, seizing the opportunity presented by Comrade Basavaraj's death, attempted to draw the CPI(M) into their own line. When they failed to do so, they surrendered to the enemy. The first step in this direction was taken by former Soviet Union member Mallojula Venugopal. In October 2025, Mallojula, along with a group of guerrillas he influenced, surrendered to the Indian ruling class, calling for "a ceasefire and negotiations with the bourgeoisie." Mallojula was publicly known as the "end." This traitor, while believing he would bring about the end of the CPI(M), ended up bringing about his own end. After Comrade Basavaraj's assassination, Hidma, who was appointed party general secretary, was captured and killed, further exacerbating the leadership crisis within the CPI(M). The second major betrayal within the CPI(M) occurred on February 24, 2026, when Tippiri Tirupathi, Telangana state committee secretary Bade Chokka Rao, and state committee member Nune Narasimha Reddy surrendered to the police in Telangana state, betraying the party. Internal betrayals have occurred before in the history of the Indian revolution. In 1961, communist cadres waged a relentless struggle against the capitulationist and revisionist line that emerged within the CPI. In response to this internal struggle, the CPI(Marxist) was founded in 1964. However, the CPI(Marxist) did not achieve a radical break from the revisionist line it adopted. It followed a revisionist line in armed struggle, ideological assessments of the Soviet Union and the CCP, and on the path and nature of the revolution. The ideological struggle waged against the Communist Party of the Peoples (CPP) was also waged against the CPP (Marxist). Charu Majumdar spearheaded this struggle. Focusing on his studies of Moa Zedong, Charu Majumdar wrote his views known as the "Eight Historical Documents." He clarified his views on the role of the peasantry in the revolution, armed struggle, the role of the party in the revolution, the evaluation of the Soviets, and the parliamentary path. Thus, a radical break was achieved from the line that betrayed the revolution, and the CPP(ML) was officially founded on April 22, 1969. Charu Majumdar was captured and murdered on July 28, 1972. The enemy follows similar methods to end the revolution and destroy the Communist Parties. The bourgeoisie works to eliminate the forces fighting against it using the military power of the state. Where it fails to achieve this, in addition to the violence it employs, it carries out massacres, burns villages in rural areas, displaces people, kills prominent figures through extrajudicial executions, bans mass demonstrations, fills prisons with dissidents, etc. We know all this from what has been done in our country. The same methods, and even more, were used against Maoist forces in India. The second method followed by the bourgeoisie is to create distrust by recruiting traitors within the party. They bring those who surrender onto television to speak, to conduct anti-revolutionary propaganda, and to call on everyone to surrender. They infiltrate the party with agents, create divisions, and sow discord within the party, identifying and eliminating leading cadres at the first opportunity. Many communist parties know and have experienced these things firsthand. During the September 12th period, those who were branded as traitors became informants in court. Some were even brought onto television to call for surrender. The emergence of traitors from within the HKP(M) led to some controversy. This was natural, as the global Maoist movement had high expectations of the HKP(M). Considering 1969 as a baseline, a 53-year-old party shouldn't have suffered such heavy losses consecutively. It was known that the enemy was under intense attack. With this attack, codenamed "Operation Kagaar," the enemy continues its relentless assault on areas heavily populated by the CPI(M) with a force of 60,000 troops. The CPI(M) should have developed some countermeasures to both defend against these attacks and prevent further losses. This is an assessment based on the information we have. The CPI(M) is, of course, a Maoist in its approach to all these events.
No comments:
Post a Comment