maoist road in the debate for international mlm conference

Maoist Road has published this letter for the debate into MCI and MRI

A reply to PBSP MUG 2nd Letter to Maoist Road Magazine

Maoist Road considers this letter in the camp of parties and organisations that want an advancement of unity-struggle process for a new international conference

this letter accuse our revew as 'centrism and opportunism',

Maoist Road works for a new RIM - the name it is not important - based on marxism-leninism-maoism against 'new sintesis' positions and revisionist positions Prachanda Battarai in PCUNmaoist Nepal .. is this opportunism and centrism ?

In the international conference for a new RIM  we want that partecipe all parties and organisations of the Rim and all parties and organisations that want build this new international organisation mlm as new center of mlm in the world.

Is this centrism and opportunism ?

Of course all these parties and organisations in the Rim and in the mlm MCI are differents positions abaout various important items in ideology, history, strategy and tactics and the international conference realize with unity-struggle a new common base for  this 'new RIM' as in the past are Declaration 1984 - declaration 'long live marxism leninism maoism' - for a century of wars people in the world'  this common base

this common basis will have a balance of rim experience,the condanm of bob avakianism sintesys and revisionist line Prachanda Battarai, a new resolution about intenational situation and the tasks of  MCI mlm today, new international princips about organisation and methods of  internal live on based positive and negative lessons of Corim.

Is this centrism or opportunism ?

In this conference we work for the the presense of important parties mlm in the world, PCIm India, PCPhilippines, all parties and organisations that condanm bob avakian sintesys, and revisionist line Prachanda-Battarai and of course are invited parties and organisations that have teory and praxis in different countries: existence in web it is not a criteria

Is this centrism and opportunism ?

The most important parties in the  MCI mlm - as PCIm india- PCPhilippines- PCP perù - recognise  today just this moment PCUNm as a party with internal struggle between revisionist line Prachanda-Battarai and revolutionary line.

Can Maoist Road, which works for an international conference with these parties, have a different position ?

Is this centrism and opportunism ? Are CPIm India. CP Philippine PCP centrists and opportunists parties ?

Also in the RIM today some parties, and PCm italy is one of these ones, work for a internal meeting in the next months for a regrouping of parties and organisations of Rim, to contribute to the conveining and organisation of this conference as soon as possible.

Is this centrism and opportunism ? Are all those parties of the Rim which work for this purpose, centrist and opportunist ?

Finally, comrade, does the PBSP MUG - a Rim party - want to participate in this meeting of parties of Rim and then in the international MLM conference ?

maoistroad greetings

maoistroad

December 2011

PBSP MUG 2nd Letter to Maoist Road Magazine

PBSP MUG 2^nd Letter to

Maoist Road

Magazine

Comrades,

Again we are raising the same points that we made in our first letter. In reply, you continued your followed centrism and opportunism. This is the same role that Avakian-led RCP USA and CoRIM had taken in excuse of so called peace line in Peru. And everybody knows that they were the one who, by keeping close relation with right opportunists of CPN (Maoist), contributed in emergence of Prachanda revisionism. Still Kiran-Gaurav-Basanta are admirer of them!

The devastating right opportunist line that emerged in early 90s in PBSP in our country led by Anwar Kabir was enough to destroy party and revolution. CoRIM continued to have close relation with the right opportunist PBSP (CC group) [this group was named CC group by CoRIM] and also with the BSD [ML] which left armed struggle long before. Interestingly, the special meeting of RIM called by you actually is a joint initiative of yours, Naxalbari group of India, Kiran-Gaurav-Basanta group of Nepal and AK led PBSP CC group. All these groups previously upheld the surrenderism of revisionists of Nepal led by Prachanda, and at last advocated a “secret two lines struggle”. AK CC group made the logic that if Mao had joined the coalition government with Chian-Kai-Shek, what would happen?

What a capitulationist logic!

PBSP CC group in their last document, what they call new theses, struggled against whatever positive aspect in history by taking the side of whatever negative aspect in history. Domestically they centered their struggle against Siraj Sikder Thought and internationally against Communist party of Peru and Gonzallo Thought, while they embraced Avakian’s new synthesis by taking that in their consideration. Now like you, they are also saying that revolution is being carried in Nepal by Kiran-Basanta-Gaurav!

What is remaining of revolution in Nepal?

Kiran-Gaurav-Basnta was follwer of Prachanda-Baburam in the past. Several years before, by the order of Prachanda, Basanta came to Bangladesh to attend a conference of ultra revisionist Socialist Party of Bangladesh [Basad]. There he branded Bangladesh Maoists as dogmatist. Still they are in the same party of Prachanda-Baburam and still they are united with them. Actually there is no two line among them. They are not against the surrenderist line of Nepal that is continuing since 2006. Rather, what they want is “dignified surrender”. And that is the thing you want to glorify! Don’t you?

So, what is the line you are following? Isn’t that the revisionist path of Two Combines into One?

Is there anything more opportunist than that?

Unfortunately the same thing happened in case of CCOMPOSA. We know that Communist party of India (Maoist) is against revisionism of Nepal. But when they sign in CCOMPOSA and eight party May Day Statement, that made enough confusion.

So, will RIM and CCOMPOSA be rebuilt on the basis of centrism and opportunism, as it had been the case of RIM since 90s?

We believe in international unity and organization of communists. But that should have to be based on MLM, not centrism and opportunism.

Crush Centrism! Crush opportunism!

Long live Proletarian Internationalism!

Long live Marxism-Leninism-Maoism!

Shovon Rahman