Tuesday, July 14, 2026

YORUM | Öncesi ve Sonrası ile NATO Toplantısına Dair… Özgür Gelecek Gazetesi - for debate

"''NATO 3.0'' ise Rusya'nın yeniden temel askeri tehdit olarak tanımlandığı, Çin'in uzun vadeli stratejik rakip olarak dikkate alındığı ve Avrupa'nın kendi savunmasının daha büyük bölümünü üstlenmeye zorlandığı yeni dönemi anlatıyor."

Belli periyotlarda yapılan NATO toplantılarından 36.sını geride bıraktık. Fakat yankıları hala devam ediyor. 20 gün içinde kayıtlara göre 548 kişi tutuklandı. Devrimci-demokratik muhalefetin dışında TEMA Vakfı’ndan onlarca kişi, örgüt üyesi oldukları gerekçesiyle tutuklandı. Başta Ankara olmak üzere İstanbul ve İzmir’de onlarca devrimci-demokrat tutuklandı.

Elazığ Valiliği bile Ankara’da yapılacak toplantıyı gerekçe göstererek il genelindeki tüm etkinlik ve eylemleri 14 günlüğüne yasakladı. Peki neden bu korku? Efendilerine güçlü uşak mesajı vermek için. Sokak gösterilerinden ve devrimcilerden korktukları için. Anti-emperyalist mücadelenin büyümesini engellemek için. Ayladır sokaklarda mücadele veren NATO karşıtı platformları engellemek ve dağıtmak için…

Emperyalizme ve NATO’ya göbekten bağımlı Türk devleti, efendilerinin gözüne girmek için ne yapacağını şaşırdı. Trump geliyor diye aylar öncesinden hazırlıklara başladılar. Erdoğan, büyük diktatörden istediklerini almak için 200 milyon liraya dev NATO panoları yaptırarak Ankara otobanlarını, şehrin kaldırımlarını donattı. Yüz milyonlarca lira para harcayarak şehrin eski yapılarını boyadılar, birçok eski yapıyı cilaladılar. Ankara’yı makyajladılar.  Bunu yapamadıkları yerlerde de branda çekerek görünmemesini sağladılar.

Makyajın arkasında yatan yoksulluğu göstermemek için çok çaba gösterdi AKP-MHP hükümeti. İşçi ve emekliler, öğrenci ve memurlar, emekçiler yoksullukla, açlıkla mücadele ederken Saray rejimi, şatafatlı gösterişler yaptı. Uluslararası kanlı terör örgütü NATO’yu protesto eden binlerce işçi, memur, öğrenci polis zoruyla tutuklandı, işkenceye maruz kaldı.

Le sommet de l’OTAN en Turquie : un bilan - for debate

 

Le sommet de l’OTAN en Turquie : un bilan

Dans le contexte actuel de concurrence mondiale, même les structures transnationales sont inévitablement amenées à évoluer. Depuis un certain temps déjà, l’OTAN assume une fonction davantage tournée vers le front intérieur (de contre-révolution préventive) que vers l’extérieur. Elle reste l’axe d’intervention de l’impérialisme occidental, mais on assiste à une dimension de plus en plus hétérogène, liée à la crise d’hégémonie de l’impérialisme. Dans ce contexte, les États-Unis restent l’élément hégémonique et central pour les pays impérialistes.

Le récent sommet de l’OTAN à Ankara, qui s’est tenu les 7 et 8 juillet, a été présenté par la propagande occidentale comme un succès retentissant. On y parle d’unité, de milliards de nouveaux contrats de défense et d’un engagement « inébranlable » envers l’article 5 du Traité de Washington. Les gros titres se réjouissent que l’Alliance ait survécu aux tensions. Cependant, un regard plus approfondi, loin des feux d’artifice médiatiques, révèle un tableau bien différent. Le sommet d’Ankara était l’expression d’un empire qui lutte pour maintenir son hégémonie tandis que ses vassaux, craintifs mais de plus en plus autonomes, cherchent à assurer leur propre survie. L’OTAN n’est pas une alliance défensive, c’est un vecteur des intérêts de Washington, et son histoire récente est celle d’une expansion constante vers l’Est, une provocation calculée qui a systématiquement ignoré les préoccupations légitimes de la Russie en matière de sécurité.

Tunisie : Le prisonnier Ghassan Boughdiri entame une grève de la faim après 120 jours de détention


Le militant tunisien Ghassan Boughdiri a annoncé le début d’une grève de la faim illimitée après plus de quatre mois de détention. Il est détenu depuis 120 jours sans avoir été auditionné par le juge d’instruction et dénonce des accusations infondées.

Dans une lettre rendue publique, il affirme que « la Palestine a réécrit son droit au prix du sang et du feu » et que la résistance à Gaza a contribué à créer « un climat révolutionnaire mondial pour la propagation de la liberté ». Il réclame son droit à être entendu et à pouvoir se défendre face aux accusations portées contre lui.

A disputa pelos espólios de Bolsonaro e o rumo das eleições - brasil

  Revista Revolução Cultural


A combalida candidatura presidencial de Flávio Bolsonaro ganhou mais uma fissura com o vídeo em que a esposa de seu pai, Michele, expõe seu enteado por tê-la “desrespeitado” e “apunhalado”. Embora não tenha havido nenhuma espécie de derretimento da candidatura de Flávio, o fato é que a disputa pública se configura como mais uma barreira para que ele consiga vender a imagem de “moderado” e atrair para sua campanha os eleitores considerados indecisos, decisivos agora como em 2022.

 

Para além da superfície, é preciso olharmos o jogo de forças por trás desta disputa, que se trava em última instância pelos espólios do legado de Bolsonaro: a defesa do golpe militar, os 700 mil mortos da Covid e alguns milhões de votos. Como todo e qualquer caudilhismo, também aquele reunido em torno do capitão do mato tende à divisão com o desaparecimento (neste caso, um sui generis desaparecimento em vida) do seu chefe. Na verdade, a candidatura de Flávio representa uma mal costurada frente reacionária, composta por diversos setores da direita civil e extrema-direita que não depositam no “01” uma confiança estrita ou ponto de unificação.

 

O que se comprova com a atual crise interna deste movimento – que se manifesta praticamente desde o dia em que ele chegou ao governo federal – é que ele não possui uma unidade ideológica unificada, pelo contrário: ao ecletismo ideológico comum a diferentes manifestações do fascismo (eclético na medida em que vocaliza um discurso “antissistema” e que diz representar o “homem comum”, mas age em defesa dos interesses dos setores mais rapaces do capital financeiro e do latifúndio) se soma o arrivismo do velho capitalismo cartorial brasileiro, pois toda uma plêiade de figuras saídas dos estratos mais imundos da sociedade se agarraram ao vagão bolsonarista com o único intuito de abocanhar um mandato ou um quinhão das verbas públicas. Ocorre que este ecletismo, se permitiu ao Bolsonaro e aos seus galvanizarem amplo apoio entre diferentes classes sociais, também limitou a sua ação unificada e a criação de um verdadeiro partido político.

Revolutionary Students’ Front (RSF) against arrest of leftist activist for the immediate and unconditional release

 

Friends, we have come to know that today (12/07/2026), a moment ago, the Baruipur police arrested Leftist activist Layek Ali on the false charges of ‘inciting’ mass protests following the brutal rape and murder of an underage girl in Baruipur belonging to a minority. After the brutal incident, an attempt is being made to frame him in the mob lynching and death, of one of the accused. Since that incident, we have seen time and again that the ruling BJP government in West Bengal is desperate to save the BJP workers accused in the incident. The main witness and one of the accused in the incident, Prabhas Mondal, was suspiciously killed in an encounter before he could be produced in court.

On the other hand, the leaders and ministers of the RSS-BJP-run Brahminist Hindutva fascist government in the state have resorted to giving this incident a religious color, using the incident to implement their own agenda. Instead of investigating the rape-murder incident in a fair and proper manner, an attempt is being made to suppress the voices of opposition across the state by using the mob lynching incident. The just public protests against the indifference of the government and police authorities are being made a ‘crime’ and the protesters are being targeted with imprisonment. Layek’s arrest is the result of that, not an isolated incident. A few days ago, the new Rowlatt Act and the Hooliganism Act were passed in the state. In fact, the BJP government is eager to make the state opposition-free by any means, so that they can carry out all the subsequent policy decisions as agents of imperialism unobstructed. For that purpose, they are determined to use any brutal incident to their benefit.

If we do not stand against this undemocratic arrest today, tomorrow any ordinary person can be falsely accused of opposing or questioning the government. We, on behalf of the Revolutionary Students Front (RSF), are calling on all democratic, progressive, anti-fascist and leftist organizations and individuals to build a larger militant mass movement demanding the immediate and unconditional release of our friend Layek Ali.

Monday, July 13, 2026

Postmodern Opportunism June, 2026 North Coordination Committee (NCC) Communist Party of India (Maoist) - 3 -

 third part

 Post modern-opportunists and the communist party

 
Comrade Mao said that party is the most important and primary weapon which would wield the peoples
army and united front in order to liberate the people. He further said that party unity can be build only
with an ideological clarity. Comrade Mao said “Our Party will be better united on this basis, that is, on
the basis of our common understanding of ideology, politics and various policies.” Without ideological
centralism within the party there can not be a party to be called communist party. Such should be the
spirit of any organizer who wants to build a party. For a party organizer ideology should always come
first. A party organizer is the one who gives first preference to ideological work over all other work. In
context of our party, the work at ideological front have gained yet more importance. Because on one
hand we are facing the most severe deadliest assault on our party leadership while on the other hand the
opportunist-liquidation-revisionist elements are trying to turn the party into a meaningless organ
suitable for the ruling class. If we want to revive the party, if we want to liberate the oppressed and
exploited people from the murderous comprador feudal fascist onslaught then the only thing to cling
upon is M-L-M. We have to root out all the non-Marxist ideology and practices among us. If we cling
to our ideology then tomorrow if not today we will be victorious but if we for a moment became lazy
on the ideological front of our struggle then we will invite destruction of all that which our martyrs had
achieved through their bloods.
We have to remember that right opportunism is the main danger before us. Our CC-PB too had
recognized the right deviation as one of the reason for the setback. But some among the opportunist
section are parroting that left opportunism too is equally dangerous for the party. This emphasis on left
opportunism is basically a cover to hide their attack on the genuine Marxist line. For they have shifted
rightward to such an extent that correct Marxist path appears left to them. Regarding this comrade Mao
in an pamphlet titled ‘Things are beginning to change’ said “There are also a number of people whose
thinking errs on the side of revisionism or Right opportunism. They pose the bigger danger because
their ideas are a reflection of bourgeois ideology inside the Party, and because they yearn for bourgeois
liberalism, negate everything and are tied in a hundred and one ways to bourgeois intellectuals outside
the Party. Over the last few months, people have been criticizing dogmatism but have allowed
revisionism to go unchallenged. Dogmatism should be criticized, or else many mistakes cannot be
rectified. Now it’s time to direct our attention to criticizing revisionism.” Dogmatism is the reflection
of petty bourgeoisie ideology inside the party while the right opportunism is out and out bourgeoisie
ideology. Though left opportunism or dogmatic is dangerous and needs to be corrected immediately but
in the present condition when there is no left deviated political force in the country or at the world
level, its influence is minimal. The talk of left dogmatism comes up largely from the right opportunist
who wish to attack the correct Marxist line. The real enemy before us is the opportunist-liquidationist-
revisionist ideology. After having recognized the main danger, we must then mark its manifestation in
our party. The right opportunist trends/deviations finds their reflection in following manner:-
1. Attempt to make the party legal and open by deserting the ug life and the path of armed struggle
this they do by raising doubts on ug practice, they say that may be open work too is very
important and equally important to the ug work. They say that situation has changed, state has
become stronger therefore we must reflect seriously on our old form of work. (Here it is
important to note that they have neither said that one should desert the ug life nor have they said
that due to changed situation ug life and armed struggle is not possible)
2. Give importance to democracy at the cost of begetting the more important role of centralism in
the party method of democratic centralism. In the name of democracy they want to rob the
power of the higher committee to get the party line implemented at the local committee level.
They say that we will follow the HC but the HC should ask us before taking any decision
framing this as a pretext they will stop coordinating with the HC. They will swear on the name
of the martyred comrades that they are with the party and are only against the high handedness
of the HC. They say I follow the CC but the HC here is unfit to be followed.
3. They put more emphasis on the language, words, symbols, letters, inverted commas etc.. in
order to find the power gaps between the higher committee and the comrades/lower committees.
They say that the content wise the letter or whatever have been said is okay but the form of the
the language is highly problematic, that it is subjective, bureaucratic and authoritarian. Thus the
whole discussion is wished to be shifted toward the form of power in the language and the
bureaucracy inherent in it.
4. They despise any structure, they do not form a structure or if there is one then they deliberately
keep it authority-less and spineless by not linking it up with the HC. When confronted on this
question they say that when casually an issue can be resolved then what is the need for formal
meetings and reportings to the HC. They say that it is important to get the work done, structure
or no structure is a secondary aspect.
5. They oppose the party stand on gender and sexuality; they are for free love and free sex. They
are for sexual anarchism. They say that party's stand on sexual opportunism and LGBT question
is feudal and patriarchal.

In Italy maoist workers speak with palestinian representants in Milan'demostration for the freedom of palestinian prisoners

 

pc 12 luglio - A Milano per la Palestina, verso la giornata del 18

 








in Italy large diffusion in the factories and demostrations - special issue against Nato Summit in Turkey

 

Ultimo numero stampato di ORE 12 Controinformazione Rossoperaia - Il prossimo esce a settembre - info pcro.red@gmail.com

Sunday, July 12, 2026

Philippines: NPA Unit Carries Out Successful Attack On AFP Troops In Negros Oriental Province

Ang Bayan Ngayon | July 11, 2026

Red fighters of the New People’s Army-Central Negros (Leonardo Panaligan Command) attacked a seven-man team of the 62nd IB in Sitio Balingos, Barangay Hinakpan, Guihulngan City, Negros Oriental Province, on the afternoon of July 1. One soldier was killed and three others were wounded. The NPA fighters were five meters away from the state forces when they launched the attack.

According to Ka JB Regalado, NPA-Central Negros spokesperson, the targeted 62nd IB unit was serving as a blocking force for dozens of other troops conducting an encirclement and suppression campaign against the NPA unit. The NPA unit was maneuvering out of the encirclement when they spotted the 7-man military unit.

“To cover up their embarrassment, the military deliberately hid their casualties in the clash from the public,” Regalado said. The unit added that the attack was a significant blow to the military, especially given the wide scope of its focused and sustained military operations (FSMO) in Central Negros.

The NPA-Central Negros attack took place after the 62nd IB troopers indiscriminately fired their weapons in Sitio Balingos at 5:40 a.m. that same day. The military allegedly did so out of panic and fear of an impending NPA attack.

Following the incident, the military ordered the residents of the sitio to stay inside their homes for the entire day. Farmers were also barred from working in their fields. The incident caused severe fear and trauma among the residents. This is violates their human rights and the international humanitarian law.

Under the FSMO in Central Negros, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) has deployed the 62nd IB and 94th IB to the villages of Guihulngan City, La Libertad and Canlaon City in Negros Oriental Province, as well as Moises Padilla, Isabela and Binalbagan in Negros Occidental Province since June 16. These combat operations are part of the US-Marcos regime’s National Action Plan for Unity, Peace and Development (NAP-UPD) against the revolutionary movement.

According to the assessment of NPA-Central Negros, the fascist troops’ current tactic in the guerrilla front involves deploying numerous small units, a tactic developed by the US military. It’s objective is to track down, pursue and strike units of the people’s army.

Exclusif : Entretien avec la Palestinian Youth Organization (PYO)

la cause du peuple

Notre rédaction a l’honneur de publier une interview réalisée auprès de la Palestinian Youth Organization (PYO),  organisation de jeunesse liée au Front Populaire de Libération de la Palestine, fondée en 1975 dans la diaspora, avec des missions socio-éducatives contribuant à mobiliser et unir la jeunesse palestinienne au Liban et en Syrie. Dans cet entretien, la PYO nous expose les enjeux politiques récents pour le peuple palestinien et sa Résistance nationale dans la région. 

Après 1 000 jours de génocide et de résistance, peut-on dire que le peuple palestinien a remporté une grande victoire ? Comment évaluez vous la situation dans son ensemble, notamment à Gaza ?

Le 7 octobre a sans doute constitué l’événement le plus important de l’histoire du conflit avec Israël. Il a d’abord démontré que le peuple palestinien, malgré ses moyens modestes, et la bande de Gaza, soumise depuis de longues années au blocus et à la faim, étaient capables de vaincre la plus puissante armée de la région, de briser la doctrine sécuritaire israélienne arrogante et de détruire le concept de dissuasion. D’autre part, il a replacé la question palestinienne au cœur de l’agenda international après des années de marginalisation et provoqué un choc dans la conscience mondiale en faveur de la cause palestinienne, en révélant l’ampleur du caractère criminel et agressif de l’État sioniste.

Oui, ce fut une victoire militaire et politique retentissante, qui a profondément ébranlé l’image de l’occupation, suscité une vaste sympathie et un large soutien, et entraîné un tournant majeur dans l’opinion publique mondiale.

Malgré les pertes immenses subies par notre peuple à Gaza — des dizaines de milliers de civils tués, ainsi que la destruction de la quasi-totalité des villes, des localités et des camps de réfugiés de la bande de Gaza — nous nous considérons comme victorieux. Car les critères de la victoire et de la défaite, lorsqu’un peuple occupé et sans défense affronte un État raciste puissant dans un rapport de force largement favorable à l’ennemi, ne se mesurent pas aux seules pertes humaines et matérielles, mais aux résultats politiques et moraux.

Après mille jours, Israël a échoué à éliminer la résistance. La capacité de Gaza à tenir face au génocide constitue un véritable miracle. Le 7 octobre a embrasé la région et le monde, révélant le visage fasciste d’Israël, dont l’isolement international et le boycott ne cessent de s’accentuer, tandis que ses fragilités internes deviennent de plus en plus apparentes.

Palantir Technologies: el ojo que todo lo ve y el peligro de su manifiesto

revolucion obrersa
Hay compañías que venden un producto y compañías que venden una visión del mundo. Palantir Technologies pertenece a la segunda categoría, y por eso merece más atención que cualquier otra empresa de software. Detrás de la retórica de la innovación y la seguridad nacional ha construido algo más profundo y es una infraestructura de propiedad privada, cuyos medios son capaces de integrar los datos de un Estado entero —fronteras, ejércitos, policías, hospitales, fisco— en un solo sistema de identificación, clasificación y, si hace falta, eliminación del enemigo. No es una herramienta neutral que luego se usa bien o mal, pues nació para poner el cómputo más avanzado al servicio de quienes ya concentran el poder de coacción, el aparato militar, policial y de inteligencia del Estado: el capital que lo financia.

Fundada entre 2003 y 2004 por Peter Thiel junto con Alex Karp, Stephen Cohen y Joe Lonsdale, Palantir recibió capital inicial de In-Q-Tel, el fondo de inversión de la CIA. Tomó su nombre de las piedras videntes de la Tierra Media de J.R.R. Tolkien, objetos que permiten ver a distancia y comunicarse en secreto, pero que terminan dominando —o siendo dominados por— quien los usa sin poder suficiente para controlarlos. La empresa convirtió esa ironía en parte de su imagen de marca, sin advertir que el mito describe con precisión su propia función: un instrumento de vigilancia total nunca es neutral; sirve a quien ya tiene el poder de decidir sobre la vida de los demás.

Ese proyecto encontró su formulación más nítida en abril de 2026, cuando Palantir publicó en X una síntesis de veintidós puntos de «The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West (La República Tecnológica: Poder Duro, Creencias Blandas y el Futuro de Occidente)», el libro que Karp firmó en 2025 junto al responsable de asuntos corporativos de la compañía, Nicholas Zamiska. El texto reclama a Silicon Valley una deuda con el país que hizo posible su fortuna y exige abandonar las aplicaciones de consumo por el armamento, la vigilancia y la inteligencia artificial militar. Sostiene que la disuasión nuclear termina y que la del siglo XXI se construirá con software; que el desarme de Alemania y el pacifismo de Japón fueron errores que hoy se pagan, y que el culto a la inclusión debilita a las sociedades frente a otras que describe, sin matices, como regresivas o de segunda categoría.

Palantir Technologies: el ojo que todo lo ve y el peligro de su manifiesto 2

Every Tuesday, Prisoners in Iran Say No to Executions! - UPODAK


Prisoners in Iran continue one of the bravest acts of resistance inside the country by holding hunger strikes every Tuesday against executions.

This protest, now known as “No to Executions Tuesdays,” began in January 2024 in Ghezel Hesar Prison. It started when prisoners sentenced to death saw their cellmates being taken away to be hanged. Instead of silently waiting for their own turn, they chose to resist. Their action began as a cry from death row, but it has now become a nationwide prison movement.

As of Tuesday, 30 June 2026, the campaign has reached its 127th week and has spread to 57 prisons across Iran. The latest prison to join the action was Kerman Prison. This means that prisoners across the country — from Evin and Ghezel Hesar to Ahvaz, Zahedan, Tabriz, Sanandaj, Kermanshah, Shiraz, Rasht and many other prisons — are raising one common demand: Stop the executions.

This campaign deserves far wider support. Many people outside Iran, and even many Iranians abroad, are still unaware of it. Yet these prisoners are risking punishment, isolation, deprivation of basic rights and even death in order to defend the most fundamental human right: the right to life.

The Islamic Republic has always used execution as a weapon of fear. This is not a system of “justice.” It is a system of punishment and intimidation. It is used against political prisoners, protesters, oppressed national minorities, women, workers, the poor, religious minorities and many others who are denied the right to a fair trial and basic legal protections. Forced confessions, torture, secret trials and vague charges such as “enmity against God,” “corruption on earth,” “espionage,” or “collaboration with the enemy” are used to prepare the ground for state killings.

The figures are shocking. In 2025, human rights observers recorded at least 1,639 executions in Iran, a huge increase compared with 975 cases in 2024. Amnesty International’s global report, meanwhile, states that there were at least 2,159 executions in Iran in 2025. Whatever the exact number, the conclusion is the same: the Islamic Republic has turned the gallows into one of the main instruments of its rule.

The situation has become even more dangerous during the recent war with the United States and Israel. While the people of Iran suffer from bombs, sanctions, fear, economic hardship and insecurity, the Islamic Republic has used the war as an excuse to intensify repression inside the country. Thousands of people have been arrested. Political cases have been accelerated. Accusations of “collaboration,” “espionage” and “acting on behalf of the enemy” are being used to silence opposition. Human rights organisations have reported dozens of politically motivated executions during this period.

Let Us Defend the Prisoners’ Resistance in Iran

In the prisoners’ statement for the 127th week, it was stated that in the Iranian calendar month of Khordad alone — 22 May to 21 June 2026 — at least 134 executions took place. This reality means that even while the regime speaks of war, negotiations and national security, it continues to operate its death machine against the people.

The truth must be stated clearly: the people of Iran are trapped between imperialist aggression from outside and reactionary repression from within. The United States and Israel are not bringing freedom to Iran. Their attacks only create more suffering and provide the Islamic Republic with yet another excuse to increase repression against the people. Therefore, the Islamic Republic is not defending the people. On the contrary, through prisons, executions, censorship, poverty and fear, it is defending its own rule.

Against these two forces, the prisoners’ campaign points to another path: the path of people’s resistance, solidarity and the defense of human dignity.

Every Tuesday, prisoners who have very little control over their own bodies use the only weapon left to them: collective refusal. A one-day protest hunger strike says that the victims of repression will not remain silent. It says that those sentenced to death are not merely numbers. They are human beings with names, families, histories and rights. It says that the gallows must not be normalised.

The prisoners of the “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign must be supported. We support the families who wait outside prisons, often without any information, frequently under threat, and who are sometimes even denied the bodies of their loved ones after execution. We support everyone in Iran who opposes the death penalty, whether the prisoner is political or non-political. The right to life must not depend on the charge written by the regime’s courts.

We call on progressive, democratic, anti-imperialist and human rights forces everywhere to raise the voice of this campaign. The names of those sentenced to death must be made public. Families must not be left alone. Trade unions, student groups, women’s organisations, writers, artists, lawyers and political organisations must take up this cause.

Silence serves the executioner. Publicising these cases can save lives.

The demand is simple and urgent:

End all executions in Iran.

Cancel all death sentences.

Free political prisoners.

End torture and forced confessions.

Defend the right to life.

Every Tuesday must become a day of solidarity with prisoners in Iran. Every execution must be met with protest. Every name must be remembered. Every prison wall must hear that those inside are not alone.

The prisoners have kept this campaign alive for 127 weeks. It must now become our duty to carry their voice beyond the prison walls.

Support the prisoners of the “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign!

UPOTUDAK- International Committee for Solidarity with Political Prisoner

 

 

Jeden Dienstag sagen Gefangene im Iran Nein zu Hinrichtungen!

Saturday, July 11, 2026

Postmodern Opportunism June, 2026 North Coordination Committee (NCC) Communist Party of India (Maoist) - 2 -

 

second part

Lenin`s struggle against Empirio-Criticism and opportunists

 
The 20th century begins with struggle against opportunism in philosophy. Early in 1908 serious disagreements arose among the Bolsheviks on philosophical questions. Lenin had been opposing the philosophical views of A. Bogdanov since 1906 and even earlier, and he took up an uncompromising position towards those Bolsheviks, A. Bogdanov, A. Lunacharsky, V. Bazarov, who preached idealistic views in their symposium, ‘Essays on the Philosophy idealism and of revisionism in philosophy’ was one of the reflections of that decadence which began to manifest itself in political “society” and in political parties as a result of the defeat of the revolution of 1906. Lenin, who always attached considerable importance to the purity of Marxist ideology, carried on a sharp struggle against the empirio-critics, in defense of dialectical materialism, in defense of the philosophical principles of Marxism. In 1908 Lenin finished an important philosophical book, Materialism and Empirio-Criticism: Critical Notes Concerning a Reactionary Philosophy, the book second to comrade Engels Anti-Durring, became a tool in further struggle against opportunism particularly against Liquidationism.
The philosophy of empirio-criticism was propounded in 1890-1910, the time when finance capital was in the process of being established world over, it was the period when capitalism was developing into imperialism. The reactionary nature of finance capital got established in the political scenario leading to workers unrest and massive protests in Moscow and elsewhere, after which there was huge repression on the revolutionary movement, party and people. This caused many petty bourgeoisie intellectual to dessert the party. In philosophy this desertion was identified as that of the reactionary empirio-criticism. At that time comrade Lenin opened two front one was the political front in which we know that during 1908 to 1917 comrade Lenin wrote several articles exposing the liquidators and opportunist who wanted to make the party an open and legal amorphous unit. While the another front, of remarkable necessity was in philosophy where he had to defeat the empirio-critical school. The logic of empirio-critical school was the substance of opportunism. Having understood this comrade Lenin almost annihilated it in his book. We present below a the comparison between opportunism and emirio-criticism, this will help us understand the philosophical drive within the political question raised by the then opportunist, many of this will find analogy with the present day opportunist against whom our party is struggling.
Empirio-Criticism
Opportunism
On experience
Subjective idealist :- sensation of an individual is primary
Subjective idealism:- due to which they give importance to once own experience in the movement and denies the importance of theory as guiding light. They place the individuals role and feelings at the center of politics.
On objective truth
There is no objective truth. Truth is organizing form of human experience
Truth is always relative hence has to be conditional. There can not be an absolute truth.
Non partisan
Tries to project oneself as neutral. That is neither idealist nor materialist, while in essence being subjective idealist.
Never declares ones political line with clarity. Always keep on bending to end and the another like a spineless reptile. Two stool theory
On cause and effect
There is no cause and order within the nature it is all our subjective experience that gets reflected in our language.
There are many factors responsible for an effect hence it would be wrong to find cause in one factor.
The opportunist and the emirio-criticist both deny the presence of absolute truth. For it is in in their class interest to keep the truth vague and undefined so that they may follow the dictum that suits them the most, this is the basic trait of opportunism, they sit own two stools, this relativity is explained in the emirio-criticism. Comrade Lenin explains how a communist should approach this question. He says “In a word, every ideology is historically conditioned, but it is unconditionally true that to every scientific ideology (as distinct, for instance, from religious ideology), there corresponds an objective truth, absolute nature. You will say that this distinction between relative and absolute truth is indefinite. And I shall reply: Yes, it is sufficiently "indefinite" to prevent science from becoming a dogma in the bad sense of the term, from becoming something dead, frozen, ossified; but it is at the same time sufficiently "definite" to enable us to dissociate our-selves in the most emphatic and irrevocable manner from fideism and agnosticism, from philosophical idealism and the sophistry of the followers of Hume and Kant.” The deniability of absolute truth remains the trait of opportunists to the present time. When every question or issue is framed in relativity opportunism finds the best way to evade and embrace selectively. Being ug or open is relative concept for them, forming a disciplined party is again a relative concept. With relativity there comes excuse for not doing what was expected of besides when something is relative no one can charge you of being deviated from the line. Such dear was the concept of denial of absolute truth for the opportunist. It was as if the emirio-critical school provided the opportunist with an oxygen cylinder at times of pandemic like attack from Bolsheviks.
Another disturbing trait of Empirio-criticism as an philosophy is that it makes individual both the subject and the object of analysis, this sort of hyper individualism leads to subjective and non scientific emotions and speculations in practice. The petty bourgeoisie who got frighted by the failed proletariat upsurge could not muster courage to follow the ideology that calls for patience and courage finally finds solace in an philosophy that denies the need to be partisan, that encourages one to be evasive. It promotes individualism by claiming that individual emotion is more important constituent of truth than
logic. Through logic one associated with proletariat for liberation but when if someone gives more importance to emotion then one finds methods to be confined at ones own need and necessities. This ia bourgeoisie morality of emirio-critical school. Empirio-critical thoughts created and strengthened opportunism within the communist movement. But the earth shaking October Revolution in Russia shattered all the hopes of the empirio-criticism and established Leninism. After the revolution in Russia, China too followed the path laid down by Marxism-Leninism and under the leadership of comrade Mao, revolution was successful in China in 1949 and Marxism-Leninism-Maoism as new and advanced form of Marxism-Leninism also got established. Thus half of the world turned red. This was a shattering blow to the imperialist powers. To reconstruct themselves they need re-adjustment at two front one was on the political economy while the other on the ideological front. The political economy adjustment was in form of Regan Thatcher plan that came to be known as Neo-liberal policy. At the ideological level post modernism became a new tool, this too was neo; neo-emirio-criticism. This they did with the strategy of blocking the communist influence in universities by promoting the non-communist left which in fact were the empirio-criticist of the present time, they were basically post modern scholars fashioned in and around Marxism. Sometimes calling themselves new left or radical left or Neo-Marxist.
Seeing the huge influence of Marxism-Leninism in European campuses, US imperialist power assigned CIA the task to ensure that communist propaganda does not reach the European universities and in order to achieve this a special team of CIA was formed with experts from different academia and different countries. They planned a strategy, the idea of which was to unite all the non communist left intellectuals who would replace the communist intellectuals. These non communist left intellectuals were funded by the CIA and were assigned responsibilities to write and spread abusive articles and thesis on Communism and Marxism particularly on the ongoing practices in USSR and China. The thesis which animated all this mobilization of the Non-Communist Left was one which Chip Bohlen, Isaiah Berlin, Nicolas Nabokov, Averell Harriman and George Kennan ardently supported. This team was assigned the task to fight against totalitarianism. The team was supposed to be secret and its members were assigned individual as well as collective tasks.
At the political economy front Imperialist power again got stuck in crisis. The finance capital got more and consolidated in few hands. Banks got more powerful while the consumer barely had money to pay back the loan. As the crisis grew within the economy, political unrest and peoples movement sprang up throughout the world, 1960s became the decade of revolution throughout the world. The world socialist revolution seemed nearer at that time. But the series of betrayal by the revisionist leaderships in Russia by Khrushchev after comrade Stalin and in China by Deng after comrade Mao, world proletariat got stuck in deep grief. The petty bourgeoisie too lost its hope. At such times when the world proletariat power did not have any state power, the imperialist bourgeoisie promoted the so called non communist left ideologies which basically were the neo-empirio-criticism, this ideology came to be known as post modernism. The petty bourgeoisie which was grief laden got romantically attracted to the ruling class ideology of post modernism. Post-modernism appears everywhere from art, literature, architecture to sex and food everything around us have its imprint. Such strong was the propaganda machine of the imperialist powers against Communism. The team of the anti-communist left intellectual along with their boss CIA performed extremely well and got results by establishing the concrete hold of post modernism in the campus spaces.
continue

Apoyar la Guerra Popular en la India, un deber para el proletariado mundial y los revolucionarios

 revolucion obrera

Apoyar la Guerra Popular en la India, un deber para el proletariado mundial y los revolucionarios 1

En la India, el pueblo dirigido por el Partido Comunista de la India (maoísta) continúa desarrollando una de las batallas más heroicas y determinantes de la época actual contra el capitalismo y el imperialismo, una lucha que es mucho más que una guerra en un país lejano de Colombia o una insurgencia aislada de los problemas del resto del mundo. La Guerra Popular en la India, por el contrario, es hoy por hoy la punta de lanza de la Revolución Proletaria Mundial y la demostración práctica de que el camino de la Guerra Popular está plenamente vigente, como la única alternativa real para solucionar de fondo los problemas principales del pueblo.

Y eso lo saben muy bien los reaccionarios y sobre todo el Estado indio con el asesino Modi a la cabeza, quien continúa llevado una agresiva campaña militar de cerco y aniquilamiento, contra el aguerrido pueblo de la india y contra los dirigentes de masas a quienes persigue, tortura, encarcela y asesina

Es por tanto, imperativo comprender la urgencia de la solidaridad internacionalista, denunciar la naturaleza criminal del Estado indio, donde el gobierno actúa en abierto acuerdo con los imperialistas quienes están sedientos de apoderarse de las inmensas riquezas de las regiones habitadas por las comunidades indígenas (adivasis) y campesinas.

Desde hace décadas, el pueblo de la India viene desarrollando una poderosa guerra popular contra la semifeudalidad, contra el capitalismo y contra el imperialismo, una guerra que viene desde mayo de 1967 cuando se llevó a cabo el histórico Levantamiento de Naxalbari, que todo el mundo recuerda como el Trueno de Primavera. Una guerra popular que conquistó los corazones y las voluntades de decenas de miles de campesinos, indígenas, obreros, intelectuales, jóvenes y viejos, mujeres y hombres… todo lo cual llevó a una portentosa y esperanzadora guerra popular; un ejemplo para los pueblos del mundo que los reaccionarios consideraron como «el enemigo número uno»… ¡¡Hay que destruirlo hasta sus cimientos!! es la consigna de Modi, la burguesía y los imperialistas.

Y la agresión estatal adquirió varios rostros con nombres cínicos como la «Operación Cacería Verde» o la «Operación SAMADHAN». En la actualidad, el régimen ha escalado su brutalidad mediante la denominada «Operación Kagaar» (Guerra Final), una estrategia militar que en los últimos años ha dejado una estela de muerte y destrucción verdaderamente dantesca y que pone de relieve la naturaleza del capitalismo; el ultimátum del gobierno era explícito, pretendían aplastar por completo la resistencia revolucionaria y al Partido Comunista de la India (maoísta) para marzo de 2026. Una ofensiva con bombardeos aéreos, drones, ejecuciones extrajudiciales, violaciones sistemáticas, incendios provocados, todo para romper la unidad de las masas con sus dirigentes y diezmar al pueblo luchador… Todo aquel que se atreva a alzar la voz contra el despojo de tierras, contra el Estado o contra las atrocidades del ejército es tildado inmediatamente de «terrorista» o «maoísta».

La resistencia heroica del pueblo de la India y la necesidad de una fuerza internacional como parte de la lucha

Las masas indias no se han doblegado. Bajo la dirección del PCI (Maoísta) y la heroica lucha armada del Ejército Guerrillero Popular de Liberación (EGPL), la clase obrera y el campesinado siguen resistiendo con un heroísmo inquebrantable. Pese a las dolorosas pérdidas de cuadros experimentados, los revolucionarios defienden con firmeza las zonas guerrilleras y promueven la expansión de los Comités Populares para hacer de ellos, las bases de apoyo para reconstruir lo destruido por los asesinos del Estado. La experiencia del pueblo de la India en estos 59 años demuestra al mundo que las masas explotadas sí pueden gobernarse a sí mismas sin contar con el podrido Estado burgués.

La lucha del pueblo de la India es nuestra también, somos una sola clase en todo el mundo, somos un solo pueblo en todo el mundo; y el imperialismo y el capitalismo son los mismos aquí y en cualquier parte del planeta. El internacionalismo debe ir mucho más allá de un apoyo formal. Por eso el llamado del Comité Internacional de Apoyo a la Guerra Popular en la India (ICSPWI) sigue siendo desplegar permanentes campañas de agitación y lucha para que sean encabezadas por los revolucionarios en todos los países y que movilicen a miles, o si es posible a millones de personas, en defensa de la Guerra Popular y contra las atrocidades del Estado indio. Y parte importante de ello es difundir la verdad de lo que es la revolución naxalita, romper el cerco de desinformación impuesto por los medios de comunicación y denunciar los crímenes de Modi y sus amos y socios imperialistas.

La masacre y persecución contra los que luchan en la India pone de relieve que el capitalismo está en su fase de descomposición en todo el planeta; y como cualquier fiera herida de muerte, da zarpazos a diestra y siniestra, es como un tigre que ruge en su delirio como fiera arrinconada, mientras sus músculos se tensan y quiebran en la última batalla contra la muerte. El capitalismo es como un tigre herido de muerte, pero que requiere de una gran lucha para sepultarlo. Bien lo sentenció Mao cuando dijo que:

“Todos los reaccionarios son tigres de papel. En apariencia son terribles, pero en realidad no son tan poderosos. Desde el punto de vista estratégico, debemos desdeñar totalmente a nuestros enemigos, pero desde el punto de vista táctico, debemos tomarlos muy en serio

hommage aux dirigeants maoistes assassinées en Inde - Hüseyin Uzundağ

 

Turquie : Un prisonnier maoïste rend hommage aux dirigeants maoïstes indiens assassinés

Depuis sa cellule en Turquie, Hüseyin Uzundağ, détenu depuis 2002 dans une prison de haute sécurité, a publié un long poème consacré à plusieurs cadres du Parti communiste d’Inde (maoïste) morts lors d’affrontements avec les forces de sécurité indiennes. Il rend notamment hommage à Basavaraj (Nambala Keshava Rao), secrétaire général du PCI (maoïste), tué le 21 mai 2025 avec 27 autres membres du mouvement, ainsi qu’à Hidma, commandant de l’Armée guérilla de libération du peuple, et à Renuka, militante maoïste, tués en 2025. Intitulé « Adieu aux Tigres de Gundekot », le texte célèbre la guerre populaire en Inde et la figure des combattants issus des communautés adivasis, populations autochtones du centre du pays.

 

El mundial de la FIFA y la solidaridad internacional con el pueblo de México

Fuente: X.com 
 

Diferentes medios de información nacionales e internacionales dieron cobertura a las acciones de protesta desarrolladas en el marco de las celebraciones del mundial de futbol en nuestro país. En el mundo, agencias como The New York Times, France 24, Euro News, Deutsche Welle y Al Jazeera, entre otras, difundieron lo que el Estado mexicano pretendía mantener oculto bajo la mesa.

Por sí misma la Huelga Nacional de la CNTE y su llamado al Boicot contra el mundial de la FIFA 2026, respaldado por diversos sectores movilizados (FECSM, Madres buscadoras, transportistas, movimientos anti-gentrificación, comunidades en resistencia, organizaciones revolucionarias, etc.) rompió el cerco mediático del régimen haciendo sentir el peso de la masa con acciones que se realizaron no solo en la Ciudad de México sino también en diferentes estados de la república durante los 20 días que duró la huelga y todos los partidos que jugó la selección nacional, donde las Madres buscadoras tuvieron un papel destacado enfrentando la represión del Estado.

 

Fuente: Periódico Mural

Claudia Sheinbaum no pudo tapar el sol con un dedo. El mundo hoy sabe que no es verdad que su gobierno goce de la total aceptación entre los trabajadores y los pueblos de México, sino que, al contrario, cada vez profundiza más su contradicción con las amplias masas populares que identifican a Morena y todos los partidos electoreros del régimen como instrumentos al servicio del imperialismo para garantizar la opresión semi-colonial de nuestro país. 

 

Internacionalismo proletario.

 

Fuente: El Pueblo

 

Pero más allá de la difusión que hicieron las diferentes agencias de noticias, queremos destacar la labor de los medios de información revolucionarios que desde diversas partes del mundo compartieron notas y reflexiones en el marco de las protestas en México contra el mundial de la FIFA 2026, mostrando su solidaridad con la Huelga Nacional de la CNTE, con nuestra organización democrática y con los diversos sectores organizados que impulsamos el Boicot.

Friday, July 10, 2026

Continue the mobilization against Operation Kagaar and in support of the people's war in India ICSPWI Italy


After the initiatives against Operation Kagar and solidarity and support for the people's war in India carried out in recent months (we recall the very important initiatives in Brussels on 27 January, and on 28 March in Zurich this year which had international resonance), according to the national and international commitments undertaken in the meetings held in Italy, the Committee to support the people's war in India is preparing for other initiatives that will be carried out during the next summer.

Regarding the large international participation in the initiatives, we reiterate what the Committee wrote in its communiqué published after the Zurich demonstration: "The International Committee for the Support of the People's War in India (ICSPWI) appreciates all the forces that have taken to the streets and considers them as a whole a great basis for continuing this battle and a great source of encouragement for the revolutionary and democratic forces, and for the Communist Party of India (Maoist) who are fighting bravely in India in these difficult hours to safeguard the Party, the People's Army and the path and practice of people's war".

Today, the pressing need for the continuation of the mobilizations is also due to the fact that the fascist Hindutva government of Narendra Modi, in particular with the active participation of its Minister of the Interior Amit Shah, continues to carry out repression throughout the country, a real war against the people, always far from the international spotlight that purposely ignores what is happening in the Indian subcontinent.

As the Indian comrades recount through their communiqués, in order to achieve their objectives "the armed forces are unleashing the reign of terror on the Adivasis, from rape and killings to aerial bombardment and burning of entire villages ... The leaders and cadres of the CPI (Maoist), who are on the side of the people in the struggle for their rights, are systematically murdered. We have seen how a massive extension of forests in central India was handed over to the multinationals immediately after the killing of the General Secretary Comrade Basavaraj. In this climate, revolutionary mass political organizations resist like a fortress against the fascist agenda." (RSF)

In fact, these attacks are daily: bombings, use of drones, deployment of thousands of policemen, soldiers, special death squads such as CoBra, with extrajudicial assassinations that mainly target not only those who lead the struggles but also those who sympathize with these struggles and denounce the repressive activity of the Hindutva fascist government, and who for this reason become the object of particular attention: from students, to university professors, to poets, writers and intellectuals subjected in these days to searches in almost the entire country and in general all accused of being "Maoists" or "urban Maoists", intellectuals accused and arrested and made to die in prison because they "think", as the Indian State Prosecutor said before the Supreme Court in relation to Dr. G.N. Saibaba, who had a disability of 94%. "The brain is more dangerous than the body"! he said.

These incessant attacks are directed against the workers and the Indian masses in general, attacks on their fundamental rights: the right to wages, work and safety at work, housing, the right to land and a decent life, the right of women not to be raped, attacks on freedom of expression, freedom of demonstration, religious freedom, through forced expulsions from the forests to make room for industrial and mining multinationals inside and outside the country that are mainly in the hands of capitalists friends of Modi, namely the billionaires Adani, Ambani, Agarwal, Tata, Jindal... always at the service, therefore, of the Indian ruling classes and imperialism, not only that of the USA, but also that of Russia, China and all the others.

The Indian government is highly appreciated by these imperialist countries because it provides them with an immense amount of cheap labour, made even more precarious by the reform of labour codes, both inside the country and outside the country by emigration. All this feeds misery (remember that the government is forced to give 5 kilos of rice a month to about 800 million poor people!) and unemployment of millions of young people, and it is against those who oppose this growing misery that the government unleashes its atrocities, while spending billions on the arms race.

A situation that the comrades who fight against the government and who lead the ongoing people's war, the comrades of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) and other struggle organizations, describe as very difficult, which also sees a fierce struggle going on against those who would like to liquidate not only the Party but the whole experience of the people's war, in short, a situation that has worsened with Operation Kagaar: a ferocious operation, an unrelenting fight, because the government wants to put an end to the ongoing people's war.

The deadline that the Modi government and its gang of assassins, that of March 31, however, failed to meet, due to the resistance put in place by the people's war, and the mobilization of many organizations of struggle within the country; This date, on the contrary, has become a challenge and mobilizations around the world have transformed it into a message of liberation and revolution.

In fact, for the proletariat the struggle of the Indian people is of international importance and the New Democratic Revolution in India represents one of the most important fronts of the world anti-imperialist struggle. Its defeat or victory will have a direct impact on the balance of forces between imperialism and the proletarian revolution, the struggle of the peoples on a world level.

But in recent months the genocidal Indian government, which boasts of becoming part of the three main world economies in the coming years, has not limited itself to unleashing even more repression against its own people, increasingly resorting to prison and the number of political prisoners who suffer torture, it has also worked hard to strengthen its military apparatus at all levels and strengthen the international consensus around its Operation Kagaar.

In this framework of pressing search for alliances "in today's uncertain world", as Modi repeated several times in his speech to the Knesset, to the Israeli parliament on February 25, an "uncertainty" due to the tendency to world war for a new division of the world, "visits" to various countries have begun, starting, precisely, with Nazi-Zionist Israel, accused by the UN once again of genocide of the children of Gaza, spending honeyed words to make even stronger military and commercial agreements and confirming the close ideological link between Zionism and Hindutva fascism.

Modi then moved from the Italy of the fascist Meloni in May, and in both cases, elevating bilateral relations through the Special Strategic Partnership, he made even stronger agreements from a political point of view, from a commercial point of view with the IMEC corridor and military for the strengthening of the war apparatus.

It is for all this that, as was said in the speech in the square at the end of the demonstration in Zurich, the tasks of the International Support Committee, the supporters of the people's war in India and the Communist Party of India (Maoist), are to continue the denunciation and all-out mobilization within the "International Emergency Campaign" against Operation Kagaar.

In the months of July, August and September, therefore, other initiatives are planned in Italy, such as a demonstration at the Indian embassy and an assembly in Rome against repression and for the release of political prisoners, an information campaign and organization of Indian workers and an anti-imperialist mobilization against the IMEC project, with particular regard to relations between India and the Italy of the fascist Meloni, and relations between India and Israel, both also complicit in the genocide in Palestine.

International Committee in Support of the People's War in India June 2026

Thursday, July 9, 2026

Postmodern Opportunism June, 2026 North Coordination Committee (NCC) Communist Party of India (Maoist) - 1

first part

Postmodern Opportunism

Introduction:- The confused petty bourgeoisie in Indian revolution

Since the beginning of class society, crisis begins to find expression in several dimensions of human
existence (social, political, economical, biological etc..). It got more frequent and worse when the reign

of capital got institutionalized. In the present era of world capitalism crisis is a constant phenomenon, it

is actually a result of the inherent contradiction of capitalism; capitalism is based on the model of

individual appropriation (the products of human labor are confiscated by the capitalist) and public

production (workers collectively do the production process). This basic contradiction causes all the

modern crisis be it in share market, data market, extractive industries, land, industrial units, real-estate

market and other such capital generating units crises drive the economy, society and the individuals, it

shapes the mental and physical capacity of people. Resulting into alienation from the production

process and reduction of an individual participatory role in the social and natural structures. This is

termed Alienation. Comrade Marx said that alienation appears not only in the result, but also in the

process of production and productive activity itself. The worker is not at home in his work which he

views only as means of satisfying other needs. For the workers work is an activity directed against

himself, that is independent of him and does not belong to him. This kind of alienated labor succeeds in

alienating man from his species. Species life, productive life, life creating life, turns into a mere means

of sustaining the worker's individual existence, and man is alienated from his fellow men. Finally,

nature itself is alienated from man, who thus loses his own inorganic body.

Such groaning psychic crisis of individual involved in production process finds reflection among

middle classes too. In India during the corona crisis millions of workers and middle class individuals

migrated towards their villages. The pandemic laid open the inherent rift in the society which were

otherwise covered up by the high towering highways, expressways and roads. The working classes

along with a section of middle class migrated from their working places to their villages, many died in

this process. What explains this migration? Is this not social alienation? Lack of a sense of belonging to

a place made them feel vulnerable. Clearly cities are not for the workers, it is a site for gaining strength

(money) in order to retreat to villages. But neither are the city a place to be associated with by the

middle classes. For the middle class it is an idealization. Middle class craves for the city but the city

never completely accepts it, the upper section of this class always remains reserve army of pretentious

city-rulers. The vast number of the lower and middle section of the middle class who do not have jobs

or are severely exploited by being at work for almost 20 hrs can not sustain themselves, they form a

large strata of unemployed/meaninglessly-employed population. They stands alienated from the society

and the family institutions; family expectation besides the need to exercise feudal supremacy in the

society or villages strangulates the middle classes. Ultimately the individual blames one's own being,

panics on ones incapacity to please the family and society. For all his failures, the individual put blames

on oneself. The rationale to blame oneself for the distressful condition is the basic and most primitive

logic of the capital. This diverts the peoples anger from the capital centric world order towards own

self. The question of emptiness and meaningless in life becomes the subject of bourgeoisie self

morality leading an individual to all kind mental and physical illness. The individual groans for help

but nothing comes forward, the bourgeoisie individual morality is no answer for the distressed class.

The precarious nature of the middle classes is due to the political position which it held. What is there
in economy finds reflection in the politics. One section of the middle class connect with the struggle of

the working class and associate with its party and thereby this section remains intact and is moving

towards its liberation. While its upper section is influenced by the liberal bourgeoisie propaganda finds

solace with drugs, supermarket, sex etc.. It is so paralyzed by the propaganda of the ruling classes that

it does not see hope in slow but steady gathering of proletariat momentum in the communist party and

in the facade of being politically neutral it sides with the ruling class parties, while constantly swearing

on being ideologically flexible it follow the ideology and politics of the ruling class and its parties but

still finds something missing. He is chased by this missing link and never compltely amalgates with the

ruling classes. Indecisiveness in all the sphere of existence is what defines this class. This malagation

almost gets stronger after the capitalist reversal in China. Ever since the revisionist came to power in

China a section of the middle class went very close to the ruling class and is propagating falsehood

about Communism and its inevitability. This is typical to the character of the middle class which

comrade Marx had marked in Lassale and against such trends comrade Lenin and comrade Mao

struggled to build a true Bolshevik party. In dark times when our movement grew very weak it is the

middle class that first flights away from the proletariat class ideology movement and becomes the slave

of bourgeoisie iedology. This flight signifies a lack of revolutionary spirit and inability to lead a

proletariat life. Intellectual honesty is also negated by the opportunist (petty bourgeoisie liberal

intellectual) who instead of analyzing ones own failings starts doubting the theory and political line

which they had been practicing some times ago. Finally they come out with some old redundant

theories through which they attack the revolutionary theory of M-L-M and joins the reaction.

In Indian context the revolutionary movement against feudalism and Imperialism particularity against

the Brahmanical feudal order of the Indian society inspired the petty bourgeoisie in the movement they

saw a liberation from the orthodox hold of the patriarchal family, of the superior being, of the blind

faith, of the caste and kin. This marked a period when vast masses of petty bourgeoisie from the

colleges and universities joined the anti feudal anti imperialist movement throughout the country. The

petty bourgeoisie could connect their own desire of freedom from the bondage of feudalism and the

freedom to pursue art and politics of their own choice with the proletariat need to accomplish NDR in

order to move toward Socialism and finally to Communism resulting into a huge influx of middle class

in the revolutionary movement. But when the revolutionary movement got weakened, its members got

martyred and the area under its control diminished then these petty bourgeoisie were the first to claim

that the path which we are to follow is tiresome and lengthy, the future is gloomy and all I can see is

destruction. They base their judgment on experience and that too on personal lived experiences.

The theoretical aspect is muzzled off and forgotten what they have now with them is an experience of

defeat on which basis they tend to stop anyone who is attempting to rebuild the old. They leave the

camp of the revolutionaries. Theory as a guide to action and as a science to understand the further

development and success of the movement or phenomenon is left aside. Finally we are left with a class

which on one end is alienated by the present ruling class order while at the other end have deserted the

revolutionary movement in order to find solace. What would be the conscious part of this life? On

which ideology their solace will be founded upon? The answer obviously is such ideology which

negates both the end but very subtly gives space for the dominance of the ruling classes ideology.

These theories varies according to the given time and space, it becomes Machist at some place

Ambedkrite at the other developing further into post modernism. At present Indian situation and the

world political condition it is the post modernist ideology that guides and strengthen the reactionary

section of petty bourgeoisie. Opportunist argues from the saying of the post modern scholars and

reactionaries like Foucault and others. Opportunist of the Lenin and Mao times were the followers of
 the Machist/Confuscious school. It would be no exaggeration to say that all the opportunist of our time are the followers of post modern thoughts and ideas.

The indecisiveness of the opportunists and the denial of objective truth, meta-narrative by the post
modern theoreticians provides the best tenant for unity between opportunism and post modern

thoughts. The imperialist finance capital has developed a very good ally in form of the post modern

thoughts and ideas. The firmness of this ally huge, within the party too, the two line struggle revolves

around the struggle against post modern ideas and thoughts. PB resolution of Aug 2024 considers post

modernism as one of the factor leading to the setback in movement. Making it urgent for us to mark the

influence of post modernism within the party and how opportunists derive their theoretical and political

power from it. Our party in PW-20 issue had brought an article on post modernism, in this several

trends of post modernism within the structure and comrade were highlighted. The article showed how

the assault of post modernism on our party is a part of the large psychological offensive of the state.

The article further stated that apart from the ideological role, post modernism is a political tool of the

ruling classes to rob the proletariat of its party. Presently when our party is waging a sharp political

ideological struggle against opportunism-liquidationism-revisionism it becomes very important to

identify major ruling class ideologies which help sustain opportunism
 
continue