NSA ‘planned to discredit radicals over web-porn use’
(BBC NEWS)
The US authorities
have studied online sexual activity and suggested exposing porn site
visits as a way to discredit people who spread radical views, the Huffington Post news site has reported.
It published a document, leaked by former
National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, identifying two
Muslims said to be vulnerable to accusations of “online promiscuity”.
An official said this was unsurprising.
But campaign group Privacy International called it “frightening”.
“Without discussing specific individuals,
it should not be surprising that the US government uses all of the
lawful tools at our disposal to impede the efforts of valid terrorist
targets who seek to harm the nation and radicalise others to violence,”
Shawn Turner, director of public affairs for National Intelligence, told
the Huffington Post.
Privacy
International said: “This is not the first time we’ve seen states use
intimate and private information of an individual who holds views the
government doesn’t agree with, and exploit this information to undermine
an individual’s message.”
The report came shortly after a group of United Nations experts adopted a “right to privacy” resolution.
It will be passed by the UN’s General
Assembly before the end of the year, but is largely symbolic since it is
not legally binding.
The UN’s Human Rights Committee said it
was “deeply concerned at the negative impact” the interception of data
“including extraterritorial surveillance” could have “in particular when
carried out on a mass scale”.
‘Young girls’
The latest of Mr Snowden’s leaked
documents is dated October 2012 and says it was distributed by the
office of the director of the NSA to other US government officials.
It names six Muslims whom it describes as
“prominent, globally resonating foreign radicalisers” about whom
surveillance efforts had revealed potential “vulnerabilities that can be
exploited”.
It says the information is largely based on gathered “Sunni extremist communications”, including material sourced by the FBI.
“Some of the vulnerabilities, if exposed,
would likely call into question a radicaliser’s devotion to the
jihadist cause, leading to the degradation or loss of his authority,” it
says.
One example is evidence of the target
“viewing sexually explicit material online or using sexually explicit
persuasive language when communicating with inexperienced young girls”.
Others include proof of the target:
- using donations to pay personal expenses
- charging exorbitant speaking fees
- using questionable sources and contradictory language in public messages
None of the six individuals who appear in the report are accused of being directly involved in terrorism.
But the document says one of the two said
to have been involved in “online promiscuity” had previously been
imprisoned for inciting hatred against non-Muslims, and the other had
been involved in promoting al-Qaeda propaganda.
Of the four other targets, one is said to
be vulnerable to being exposed for being “attracted to fame” and
another for having a “glamorous lifestyle”.
Privacy International spokesman Mike
Rispoli said: “What is frightening about the NSA’s capabilities are that
they collect massive amounts of information on everyone, including your
political beliefs, contacts, relationships and internet histories.
“While these documents suggest this type
of personal attacks are targeted in nature, do not forget that the NSA
is conducting mass surveillance on the entire world and collecting a
vast amount of information on nearly everyone.”
A spokeswoman for the NSA’s UK equivalent – GCHQ – declined to comment on details of the Huffington Post’s report.
But she highlighted the UK government’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which discusses using the internet to gather evidence against individuals in order to challenge terrorist propaganda.
“All of GCHQ’s work is carried out in
accordance with a strict legal and policy framework which ensures that
its activities are authorised, necessary and proportionate, and that
there is rigorous oversight,” she added.
from
No comments:
Post a Comment